From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Rob Browning <rlb@defaultvalue.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user
Subject: Re: [d.love@dl.ac.uk: dynamic loading of native code modules]
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 10:48:51 -0500
Sender: guile-user-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <aa6kau$1vq$2@main.gmane.org>
References: <E16vpWV-0001wJ-00@giblet>
	<m3n0w8ugmp.fsf@laruns.ossau.uklinux.net>
	<87ads6nf1v.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <87it6s7sjz.fsf@alice.rhinosaur.lan>
	<E170Hh6-0007Y8-00@giblet> <87662hkvya.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org>
	<20020424145130.GC17392@www> <87y9fd5dsj.fsf@alice.rhinosaur.lan>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1019663518 2042 127.0.0.1 (24 Apr 2002 15:51:58 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 15:51:58 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: rm@fabula.de, ttn@glug.org, mvo@zagadka.ping.de,
	neil@ossau.uklinux.net, guile-devel@gnu.org, guile-user@gnu.org
Return-path: <guile-user-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 170P3l-0000Wp-00
	for <guile-user@m.gmane.org>; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 17:51:58 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 170P2y-0002ZJ-00; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 11:51:08 -0400
Original-Received: from dsl-209-87-109-2.constant.com ([209.87.109.2] helo=defaultvalue.org)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 170P0m-0002Kn-00; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 11:48:53 -0400
Original-Received: from raven.i.defaultvalue.org (raven.i.defaultvalue.org [192.168.1.7])
	by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id CC290A126; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 10:48:51 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: by raven.i.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 5170C11CE; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 10:48:51 -0500 (CDT)
Original-To: Andreas Rottmann <a.rottmann@gmx.at>
In-Reply-To: <87y9fd5dsj.fsf@alice.rhinosaur.lan> (Andreas Rottmann's
 message of "24 Apr 2002 17:14:52 +0200")
Original-Lines: 17
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.2
 (i386-debian-linux-gnu)
Errors-To: guile-user-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:guile-user-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:guile-user@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user>,
	<mailto:guile-user-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General Guile related discussions <guile-user.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user>,
	<mailto:guile-user-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/guile-user/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:278
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user:278

Andreas Rottmann <a.rottmann@gmx.at> writes:

> I fully agree. However, I don't think manipulation of
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH is even necessary, since one can compile the
> directory (e.g. /usr/local/lib/guile1.7.0) into the guile
> interpreter/shared lib.

You mean -rpath?  That might be a possibility, though it's (at least
used to be) against Debian Policy -- there's usually a good reason,
but I'd have to go check to be sure what the rationale was, and of
course it might no longer apply...

-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org
Previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG=1C58 8B2C FB5E 3F64 EA5C  64AE 78FE E5FE F0CB A0AD

_______________________________________________
Guile-user mailing list
Guile-user@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user