From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rob Browning Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: [d.love@dl.ac.uk: dynamic loading of native code modules] Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 10:20:58 -0500 Sender: guile-user-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <874rifqeo8.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <873cxxkvj8.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <874riahonj.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1019402696 29049 127.0.0.1 (21 Apr 2002 15:24:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 15:24:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org, guile-user@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16zJCy-0007YQ-00 for ; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 17:24:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16zJCA-0001Ke-00; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 11:24:06 -0400 Original-Received: from dsl-209-87-109-2.constant.com ([209.87.109.2] helo=defaultvalue.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16zJ9F-0000ym-00; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 11:21:05 -0400 Original-Received: from raven.i.defaultvalue.org (raven.i.defaultvalue.org [192.168.1.7]) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 474C644C6; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 10:21:04 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by raven.i.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8BAF2BB0; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 10:20:58 -0500 (CDT) Original-To: ttn@glug.org In-Reply-To: (Thien-Thi Nguyen's message of "Sat, 20 Apr 2002 00:53:50 -0700") Original-Lines: 29 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) Errors-To: guile-user-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:233 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user:233 Thien-Thi Nguyen writes: > we can make incompatibilities non-gratuituous by reflecting them in the > version numbering (more "descriptive" thinking here). by this method, > the next official guile should be "2.x" -- what do people think of that? Not sure I follow what you mean by "by this method". IMO we should bump the major version to 2.0 whenever we made changes that we feel warrant it. Things I would consider warranting such a change: - Restructuring of the evaluation system and macros so that we can add compilation (and by compilation I mean anything like VM, JIT, offline->c, whatever). - Support for elisp that's ready for public use. - Performance improvement of large factors due to overhaul of XYZ. - Full numeric tower. etc. -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org Previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG=1C58 8B2C FB5E 3F64 EA5C 64AE 78FE E5FE F0CB A0AD _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user