From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: [d.love@dl.ac.uk: dynamic loading of native code modules] Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 02:06:25 -0700 Sender: guile-user-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: Reply-To: ttn@glug.org NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1019293996 30299 127.0.0.1 (20 Apr 2002 09:13:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 09:13:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org, guile-user@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16yqvj-0007sa-00 for ; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 11:13:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16yquk-0001pp-00; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 05:12:14 -0400 Original-Received: from ca-crlsbd-u4-c4c-174.crlsca.adelphia.net ([68.66.186.174] helo=giblet) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16yquT-0001p2-00; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 05:11:57 -0400 Original-Received: from ttn by giblet with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16yqp7-0003n6-00; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 02:06:25 -0700 Original-To: neil@ossau.uklinux.net In-Reply-To: (message from Neil Jerram on 13 Apr 2002 09:50:22 +0100) Errors-To: guile-user-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:219 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user:219 From: Neil Jerram Date: 13 Apr 2002 09:50:22 +0100 grep "dyn" where? m.l. archives. The description you gave of the Emacs patch glossed over one detail - what's the name of the function that gets called to initialize the dynamically loaded module? I think it would be acceptable to derive it algorithmically from the module name (and obviously impose this as a requirement on the module coder). the renaming mechanism can be user supplied. the system can supply convenience renamers, including the old renamer. [another runner is replacing lowest levels. getting load-extension and environments together, basically.] Sounds orthogonal to me; is it? which elements are you referring to? the tasks or the areas? thi _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user