From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Thien-Thi Nguyen <ttn@giblet.glug.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user
Subject: Re: [d.love@dl.ac.uk: dynamic loading of native code modules]
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 00:53:50 -0700
Sender: guile-user-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <a9r78p$q03$2@main.gmane.org>
References: <E16vpWV-0001wJ-00@giblet>
	<m3n0w8ugmp.fsf@laruns.ossau.uklinux.net>
	<874rifqeo8.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org>
	<m3bsclsyxn.fsf@laruns.ossau.uklinux.net>
	<873cxxkvj8.fsf@zagadka.ping.de>
	<m3n0w3pf1n.fsf@laruns.ossau.uklinux.net> <874riahonj.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org>
Reply-To: ttn@glug.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1019289689 26627 127.0.0.1 (20 Apr 2002 08:01:29 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 08:01:29 +0000 (UTC)
Return-path: <guile-user-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 16ypoG-0006vM-00
	for <guile-user@m.gmane.org>; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 10:01:28 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 16ypnP-00046J-00; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 04:00:35 -0400
Original-Received: from ca-crlsbd-u4-c4c-174.crlsca.adelphia.net ([68.66.186.174] helo=giblet)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 16ypmB-0003zx-00; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 03:59:19 -0400
Original-Received: from ttn by giblet with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 16ypgs-0003jQ-00; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 00:53:50 -0700
Original-To: guile-devel@gnu.org, guile-user@gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <874riahonj.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> (message from Rob
	Browning on Wed, 17 Apr 2002 00:36:48 -0500)
Errors-To: guile-user-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:guile-user-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:guile-user@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user>,
	<mailto:guile-user-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General Guile related discussions <guile-user.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user>,
	<mailto:guile-user-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/guile-user/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:216
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user:216

   From: Rob Browning <rlb@defaultvalue.org>
   Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 00:36:48 -0500

   However I do feel like guile probably needs to be thought of as a
   project still pretty "deep in the design phase", so while we need to
   make a strong effort not to be gratuitous with our incompatibilities,
   I suspect there will still be plenty going forward, for another few
   releases at least.

we can make incompatibilities non-gratuituous by reflecting them in the
version numbering (more "descriptive" thinking here).  by this method,
the next official guile should be "2.x" -- what do people think of that?

thi

_______________________________________________
Guile-user mailing list
Guile-user@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user