From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Vollmer Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: [d.love@dl.ac.uk: dynamic loading of native code modules] Date: 15 Apr 2002 21:06:58 +0200 Sender: guile-user-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <87ads6nf1v.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <87it6s7sjz.fsf@alice.rhinosaur.lan> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1018897625 28438 127.0.0.1 (15 Apr 2002 19:07:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 19:07:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Neil Jerram , ttn@glug.org, guile-devel@gnu.org, guile-user@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16xBof-0007OZ-00 for ; Mon, 15 Apr 2002 21:07:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16xBnl-0007AU-00; Mon, 15 Apr 2002 15:06:09 -0400 Original-Received: from dialin.speedway42.dip80.dokom.de ([195.138.42.80] helo=zagadka.ping.de) by fencepost.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16xBlS-00072y-00 for ; Mon, 15 Apr 2002 15:03:46 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 2062 invoked by uid 1000); 15 Apr 2002 19:06:58 -0000 Original-To: Andreas Rottmann In-Reply-To: <87it6s7sjz.fsf@alice.rhinosaur.lan> Original-Lines: 11 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Errors-To: guile-user-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:178 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user:178 Andreas Rottmann writes: > However, I have a suggestion: If the lib is only to be used by the > .scm module (using load-extension), I see no point in putting it in > ${libdir}. Instead it would be cleaner to be able to put it > somewhere in ${libdir}/guile to avoid namespace cluttering in > ${libdir} (which is, for example, (likely to be) indexed by the > runtime linker on linux). I don't see much risk in name collisions when we name our libs like libguile-foo-bar. _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user