From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?B?55m944GE54aK?= Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Determining programatically whether the interpreter is Guile or Clisp or Emcs Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 08:47:25 +0400 Message-ID: References: <23837d79-03e3-4792-a4b7-e3a6c96ed390@email.android.com> <1375086985.8252.2.camel@Renee-desktop.suse> <66a9b4c8-96e9-421e-b74d-2eb48d26e603@email.android.com> <1375237660.8252.42.camel@Renee-desktop.suse> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1375246089 7052 80.91.229.3 (31 Jul 2013 04:48:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 04:48:09 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-user@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 31 06:48:10 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1V4OKX-0007LG-Gb for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 06:48:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57371 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V4OKX-0005cb-5h for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 00:48:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38015) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V4OKJ-0005cP-PI for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 00:48:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V4OK9-0000dT-PR for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 00:47:55 -0400 Original-Received: from deleuze.hcoop.net ([69.90.123.67]:32891) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V4OK9-0000cp-Ls for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 00:47:45 -0400 Original-Received: from [84.16.145.80] (helo=android-9cb611704b12a6c2) by deleuze.hcoop.net with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_MD5:16) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1V4OK3-0001bF-Nt for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 00:47:40 -0400 User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: <1375237660.8252.42.camel@Renee-desktop.suse> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-Received-From: 69.90.123.67 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:10586 Archived-At: Nala Ginrut wrote: >Here's a dilemma=EF=BC=8C unle= ss guile/clisp/emacs have the same >checker-procedure with same name and de= finition, you have no promise to >check it under different language environ= ment=2E The best way is >prepossess which is portable=2E Yes, I have been t= hinking very hard about this=2E The closest I came is apropos=2E At least= (apropos "guile") gives empty feedback in clisp and (apropos "clisp-data")= is empty in guile and so on=2E=2E=2E So I could differentiate based on thi= s=2E However there's no numeric output so I can't do a cond based on (=3D= =2E=2E=2E comparison of output as=3D is the only equality function the thr= ee share so it seems back to square one=2E=2E=2E=2E So close=2E=2E=2E=2E -= - =E7=99=BD=E3=81=84=E7=86=8A