From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: tomas@tuxteam.de Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Unwind-protect Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 17:57:26 +0100 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/XYk9XL0DkQGfa+J" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="1376"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: guile-user@gnu.org To: Tommi =?utf-8?B?SMO2eW7DpGzDpG5tYWE=?= Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 28 17:58:03 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1t5T47-000AcW-AJ for guile-user@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 28 Oct 2024 17:58:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t5T3f-0000Wv-2a; Mon, 28 Oct 2024 12:57:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t5T3d-0000WS-3p for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Oct 2024 12:57:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.tuxteam.de ([5.199.139.25]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t5T3b-00034s-Ei for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Oct 2024 12:57:32 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tuxteam.de; s=mail; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject :Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=n6N51iFvKgAFq6CY2YFFNJR7nOiN/a4cctwkAEjOqdc=; b=ssCykRTwtlbaj0MyxwpWvCP3St QrLFTmuCIy2/PMG0CXdpWurd24yqNBguH4HiWY3q9TeM03zWzu/8JEOte9i97Z0ZjDI/joHDbZpwt FVYQVOajJ5AZhT/jZ478QNurntrDla34RzeIWJgYvXPEmDc+eayej76SXFsdmbI8S11fEl31UHadl gnF48pKz48dz4AjDXedwzQVSpjMNaQkWpDV9fO3vIS8BXjLwrDk26m2dvGOPYLiogwzhlF9jb6CYl JPCA16oUTMuYu5QQ6E5rWyc9ojFCfnDp5+fW8SVQGvjgzQyuARvz/YMtgIONWdwI0CBDG8u7A8AT7 jrcNpoDw==; Original-Received: from tomas by mail.tuxteam.de with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1t5T3W-0000xx-V2; Mon, 28 Oct 2024 17:57:27 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=5.199.139.25; envelope-from=tomas@tuxteam.de; helo=mail.tuxteam.de X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.0 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_SBL_A=0.1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.lisp.guile.user:19853 Archived-At: --/XYk9XL0DkQGfa+J Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 04:55:01PM +0200, Tommi H=C3=B6yn=C3=A4l=C3=A4nmaa = wrote: > Unwind-protect and dynamic-wind are not the same thing. See >=20 > http://www.nhplace.com/kent/PFAQ/unwind-protect-vs-continuations-original= =2Ehtml I know (thanks for the interesting link, anyway :) BTW: doesn't Guile favour delimited continuations these days? How would things change in view of that? Of course, if you're building a generic Scheme library, you'll have to cope with the fact that full continuations are part of the language spec. Cheers --=20 t --/XYk9XL0DkQGfa+J Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABECAB0WIQRp53liolZD6iXhAoIFyCz1etHaRgUCZx/CcAAKCRAFyCz1etHa RsYzAJ0TbLNCcEDVGbE1PS4UOS+rAu8y3QCfVkPY3IgVrE5nRGWa4NytOVDr6b8= =nJ0j -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/XYk9XL0DkQGfa+J--