Is it possible to expand syntax inside match?

["Михаил Бахтерев" <mob@k.imm.uran.ru>]

Greetings!

I wondering, if is it possible to implement something like
this?

(define-syntax R (syntax-rules () ((_ r v l) #(red r v l))))
(define-syntax B (syntax-rules () ((_ r v l) #(black r v l))))

(define red-black-set-balance 
  (match-lambda
    ((or (B (R (R a x b) y c) z d)
         (B (R a x (R b y c)) z d)
         (B a x (R (R b y c) z d))
         (B a x (R b y (R c z d)))) (R (B a x b) y (B c z d)))
    (node node)))

The idea is to have some automation allowing not to write
patterns manually:

  #('black #('red #('red a x b) y c) z d)

- Mikhail Bakhterev, respectfully.