From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Jay Sulzberger Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: A bug, I think, in the process of compiling Guile 3.0.2 on NetBSD 9 Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 23:02:21 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="4746"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: Guile User Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue May 26 05:02:34 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jdPrO-0001Am-Du for guile-user@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 26 May 2020 05:02:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60064 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jdPrN-0003W4-DA for guile-user@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 25 May 2020 23:02:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43610) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jdPrE-0003Vw-B7 for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2020 23:02:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mailbackend.panix.com ([166.84.1.89]:41937) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jdPrC-0005b0-Tc for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2020 23:02:24 -0400 Original-Received: from panix3.panix.com (panix3.panix.com [166.84.1.3]) by mailbackend.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49WJfP6Zjjz11cF for ; Mon, 25 May 2020 23:02:21 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: by panix3.panix.com (Postfix, from userid 7271) id 49WJfP5M8Lz1QXJ; Mon, 25 May 2020 23:02:21 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by panix3.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49WJfP4fzxz1QWd; Mon, 25 May 2020 23:02:21 -0400 (EDT) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=166.84.1.89; envelope-from=jays@panix.com; helo=mailbackend.panix.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/25 23:02:22 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = FreeBSD 9.x or newer [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "guile-user" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.lisp.guile.user:16512 Archived-At: There is an old bug report at https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guile/2016-07/msg00038.html I believe I ran into this same bug on my way to compiling Guile-3.0.2 on NetBSD 9. After my signature is the report, as rendered by lynx. Heaven forwarding I will submit a proper bug report within a few weeks, after I learn more about the build process of Guile-3.0.2. But I ask here: Has this bug been fixed in either Guile-3.0.2 and/or NetBSD 9? Thank you for reading this! And thank you for Guile! I remain, as ever, your old beGuiled user^W^WLisper, Jay Sulzberger ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Subject: bug#24002: configure: missing call to AC_C_FLEXIBLE_ARRAY_MEMBER X-URL: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guile/2016-07/msg00038.html bug-guile [Top][All Lists] ______________________________ Search Advanced ______________________________________________________________________________________________ [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] bug#24002: configure: missing call to AC_C_FLEXIBLE_ARRAY_MEMBER ______________________________________________________________________________________________ From: Thomas Klausner Subject: bug#24002: configure: missing call to AC_C_FLEXIBLE_ARRAY_MEMBER Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2016 11:13:04 +0200 ______________________________________________________________________________________________ Hi! On NetBSD, the build of guile-2.0.12 breaks early because FLEXIBLE_ARRAY_MEMBER is not defined: In file included from strftime.c:33:0: time-internal.h:48:14: error: 'FLEXIBLE_ARRAY_MEMBER' undeclared here (not in a function) char abbrs[FLEXIBLE_ARRAY_MEMBER]; ^ config.h has: /* #undef FLEXIBLE_ARRAY_MEMBER */ I think the problem is that m4/gnulib-comp.m4 has: if test "$HAVE_TIMEZONE_T" = 0; then func_gl_gnulib_m4code_flexmember fi but on NetBSD, HAVE_TIMEZONE_T is 1 and so func_gl_gnulib_m4code_flexmember is not called and FLEXIBLE_ARRAY_MEMBER is not defined. FLEXIBLE_ARRAY_MEMBER is used in time-internal.h which is included by: lib/time_rz.c lib/timegm.c lib/strftime.c lib/mktime.c so there might be more cases where this will break. Cheers, Thomas ______________________________________________________________________________________________ reply via email to Thomas Klausner ______________________________________________________________________________________________ [Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread] * bug#24002: configure: missing call to AC_C_FLEXIBLE_ARRAY_MEMBER, Thomas Klausner <= ______________________________________________________________________________________________ * Prev by Date: bug#20339: sxml simple: sxml->xml mishandles namespaces? * Next by Date: bug#24003: guile-2.0.12: test failure on NetBSD: test-loose-ends * Previous by thread: bug#23974: Outdated instructions regarding bdw-gc in guile 2.0.11 * Next by thread: bug#24003: guile-2.0.12: test failure on NetBSD: test-loose-ends * Index(es): + Date + Thread ---------- End Forwarded message ----------