From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dirk Herrmann Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: MEMOIZE_LOCALS (fwd) Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 23:24:56 +0200 (CEST) Sender: guile-user-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1025213240 5190 127.0.0.1 (27 Jun 2002 21:27:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 21:27:20 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17NgnQ-0001Lb-00 for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2002 23:27:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17NgnB-00028g-00; Thu, 27 Jun 2002 17:27:05 -0400 Original-Received: from speedy.ida.ing.tu-bs.de ([134.169.132.53]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17Ngl7-0001z4-00 for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2002 17:24:58 -0400 Original-Received: from cicero.ida.ing.tu-bs.de (cicero [134.169.132.45]) by speedy.ida.ing.tu-bs.de (8.11.3/8.11.3/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id g5RLOue06113 for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2002 23:24:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (dirk@localhost) by cicero.ida.ing.tu-bs.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA00522 for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2002 23:24:56 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: guile-user@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-user-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:656 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user:656 Hi folks, I posted this to the guile-devel list, but I think it could be of interest to people on the guile-user list as well. So far, I have got positive feedback from Marius for the change indicated below. Thus, I urge people who disagree to this change to speak up. Otherwise I will go ahead and remove the MEMOIZE_LOCALS macro. Best regards, Dirk Herrmann ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 07:46:23 +0200 (CEST) From: Dirk Herrmann To: guile-devel@gnu.org Subject: MEMOIZE_LOCALS Hi folks, guile supports(?) to disable caching of local variable positions by undefining the macro MEMOIZE_LOCALS. First, I doubt that anybody makes use of this option. Second, I doubt that it will actually work to simply undefine MEMOIZE_LOCALS, since I don't think it is being tested. I would like to simply remove this option, making caching of local variable positions mandatory. Comments? Best regards, Dirk Herrmann _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user