* base class parameterisation?
@ 2007-06-09 6:18 Marco Maggi
2007-06-12 20:50 ` Andy Wingo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Marco Maggi @ 2007-06-09 6:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: guile-user
Ciao,
I am using GOOPS and I have a hierarchy like this:
---A---
| |
v v
A1 A2
B
I wonder if there is a way to parameterise the construction
of 'B' to let it have 'A1' or 'A2' as base class. I do not
want to use delegation.
TIA
--
Marco Maggi
"They say jump!, you say how high?"
Rage Against the Machine - "Bullet in the Head"
_______________________________________________
Guile-user mailing list
Guile-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: base class parameterisation?
2007-06-09 6:18 Marco Maggi
@ 2007-06-12 20:50 ` Andy Wingo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andy Wingo @ 2007-06-12 20:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: guile-user
Hi Marco,
On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 08:18 +0200, Marco Maggi wrote:
> ---A---
> | |
> v v
> A1 A2
>
> B
>
> I wonder if there is a way to parameterise the construction
> of 'B' to let it have 'A1' or 'A2' as base class. I do not
> want to use delegation.
I suspect you will have to make a metaclass and specialize on
allocate-instance. Something like (my GOOPS is rusty):
(define-class A-metaclass (<class>))
(define-method (allocate-instance (class A-metaclass) initargs)
(if (random-predicate) (allocate-instance A1) (allocate-instance A2)))
(define-class B () #:metaclass A-metaclass ..)
Good luck,
Andy.
--
http://wingolog.org/
_______________________________________________
Guile-user mailing list
Guile-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: base class parameterisation?
@ 2007-06-25 13:57 Marco Maggi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Marco Maggi @ 2007-06-25 13:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: guile-user
On Tue Jun 12 22:50:02 2007 +0200 "Andy Wingo" wrote:
>On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 08:18 +0200, Marco Maggi wrote:
>> ---A---
>> | |
>> v v
>> A1 A2
>>
>> B
>>
>>I wonder if there is a way to parameterise the
>>construction of 'B' to let it have 'A1' or 'A2'
>>as base class. I do not want to use delegation.
>
>I suspect you will have to make a metaclass and
>specialize on allocate-instance. Something like
>(my GOOPS is rusty):
>
>(define-class A-metaclass (<class>))
>
>(define-method (allocate-instance (class A-metaclass)
> initargs)
> (if (random-predicate) (allocate-instance A1)
> (allocate-instance A2)))
>
>(define-class B () #:metaclass A-metaclass ..)
Mh, no[1]. But thanks anyway, it has been a good
occasion to inspect some of GOOPS.
Meanwhile I have changed my design, so I need that
no more.
Ciao.
[1] <http://community.schemewiki.org/?goops-allocate-instance>
--
Marco Maggi
_______________________________________________
Guile-user mailing list
Guile-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-06-25 13:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-06-25 13:57 base class parameterisation? Marco Maggi
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-06-09 6:18 Marco Maggi
2007-06-12 20:50 ` Andy Wingo
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).