From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Brian" Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: RE: Guile under win32 Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 12:49:49 -0600 Sender: guile-user-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <20020313130101.I23703@cs.virginia.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1016048046 3631 127.0.0.1 (13 Mar 2002 19:34:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 19:34:06 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16lEVi-0000wT-00 for ; Wed, 13 Mar 2002 20:34:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16lEV1-00084Z-00; Wed, 13 Mar 2002 14:33:23 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.eqtc.com ([64.94.157.68] helo=eqtc.com) by fencepost.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16lDoS-0002nD-00 for ; Wed, 13 Mar 2002 13:49:24 -0500 Original-Received: from [64.94.157.1] (account bmcandrews HELO ROME) by eqtc.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.8) with ESMTP id 291933; Wed, 13 Mar 2002 12:49:24 -0600 Original-To: "Chris Frost" , X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 In-Reply-To: <20020313130101.I23703@cs.virginia.edu> Errors-To: guile-user-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:20 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user:20 > Now that I have guile going under win32, I'd like to use it with > Microsoft's > MFCs. I found the thread on this list from 1998 which seemed to basically > say it wasn't doable, is this still the case? > > thanks again, > -- > Chris Frost | Not sure why it would not be doable. Maybe because, in the past, libguile had to be initialized right at program startup, (scm_boot_guile). That's not the case as of 1.5.??. Look at scm_init_guile. Also, read the section on Guile Initialization Functions at http://www.lilypond.org/wiki/?Guile. _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user