From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Modified load-path proposal Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 05:55:37 -0500 Message-ID: References: <878xwx5ld2.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87u0fl3wam.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87oe5s51l4.fsf@ivanova.rotty.yi.org> <87ek6njah0.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87r7adf8h1.fsf@zip.com.au> <87vezhbknv.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87u0ey3mph.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <873bmi392j.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> Reply-To: ttn@glug.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1130761178 14576 80.91.229.2 (31 Oct 2005 12:19:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 12:19:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 31 13:19:28 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EWYcF-0000bK-Oh for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 13:18:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EWYcE-00075q-OZ for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 07:18:18 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EWXx9-0007ha-1A for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 06:35:51 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EWXtQ-0006i6-VG for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 06:32:02 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EWXKE-0003uW-Nr for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 05:55:40 -0500 Original-Received: from [207.245.121.137] (helo=mail.agora-net.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1EWXKE-0005Ql-S6 for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 05:55:38 -0500 Original-Received: from ttn by mail.agora-net.com with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EWXKD-0003Fy-Lf; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 05:55:37 -0500 Original-To: neil@ossau.uklinux.net In-reply-to: <873bmi392j.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> (message from Neil Jerram on Sun, 30 Oct 2005 22:59:32 +0000) X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:4919 Archived-At: From: Neil Jerram Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 22:59:32 +0000 Not sure what you mean by "to get around it". Do you mean that someone will change the design so that the interface does the enforcement itself; or that if the interface is precise about what it allows, someone will want to change it to be more permissive in future? both interpretations are fine. perlis? google? thi _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user