From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Arch and Guile Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 14:01:16 +0100 Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200402292232.51103.clinton@unknownlamer.org> <87r7wdma3d.fsf@alice.rotty.yi.org> <87n0707icl.fsf_-_@alice.rotty.yi.org> <87brng3xmb.fsf@alice.rotty.yi.org> Reply-To: ttn@glug.org NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1078435124 23471 80.91.224.253 (4 Mar 2004 21:18:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 21:18:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 04 22:18:25 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Az0EZ-0002RT-00 for ; Thu, 04 Mar 2004 22:18:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1Az0DN-0006UU-Mv for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2004 16:17:09 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1AyWB8-0002PN-Mn for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Mar 2004 08:12:50 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1AyVom-0008I8-Ii for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Mar 2004 07:50:15 -0500 Original-Received: from [151.38.70.199] (helo=surf.glug.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1AyVnr-00085I-Em for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Mar 2004 07:48:47 -0500 Original-Received: from ttn by surf.glug.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AyVzw-00054H-00; Wed, 03 Mar 2004 14:01:16 +0100 Original-To: Andreas Rottmann In-reply-to: <87brng3xmb.fsf@alice.rotty.yi.org> (message from Andreas Rottmann on Tue, 02 Mar 2004 01:23:40 +0100) X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:2885 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user:2885 From: Andreas Rottmann Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 01:23:40 +0100 Yeah. I have hoped my SRFI-35 implementation could be considered "something tasty" (it's more or less complete now), but so far, there was no response to this :-( it is your opportunity to go into scientist mode: response by humans is just one measurement of its worth (and not a very reliable one although entertaining at times). you can also measure/observe its complexity in time and/or space, its dependency graph, its behavior when faced w/ bad input, etc. you can write another implementation and do a side by side comparison of above. you can do a non-quantitative comparison to those implementations that cannot run on your machine. you can try compiling your code or deducing what extra hints a compiler would need to do so. thi _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user