From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2003 13:38:03 -0500 Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <877k9eobcv.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <20030430064840.GC22895@www> <200304300631.XAA05547@morrowfield.regexps.com> <200310242230.PAA03910@morrowfield.regexps.com> Reply-To: ttn@glug.org NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1067193622 15172 80.91.224.253 (26 Oct 2003 18:40:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2003 18:40:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 26 19:40:19 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1ADpoJ-0000wC-00 for ; Sun, 26 Oct 2003 19:40:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1ADpnD-0003Mq-2Y for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Sun, 26 Oct 2003 13:39:11 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1ADpmk-0003Kq-7g for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Oct 2003 13:38:42 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1ADpmE-00031U-Hp for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Oct 2003 13:38:41 -0500 Original-Received: from [207.245.84.69] (helo=colo.agora-net.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.24) id 1ADpmE-00030s-64 for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Oct 2003 13:38:10 -0500 Original-Received: from ttn by colo.agora-net.com with local (Exim 3.34 #1) id 1ADpm7-0000Fj-00; Sun, 26 Oct 2003 13:38:03 -0500 Original-To: lord@emf.net In-reply-to: <200310242230.PAA03910@morrowfield.regexps.com> (message from Tom Lord on Fri, 24 Oct 2003 15:30:05 -0700 (PDT)) X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:2328 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user:2328 From: Tom Lord Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 15:30:05 -0700 (PDT) I can try to write up a "case for shared substrings" if that would be helpful. that's not necessary, 1.4.1.x will never remove shared substrings. if there are design problems down the road, they will be solved keeping shared substrings. (your help at that time would be very welcome.) Yikes. I'm scared to ask what version of Rx you are using. You _should_ (really) be using the latest and greatest in libhackerlab, which is not currently in release. i think i'll stick w/ what i have for 1.4.2, and then look at incorporating the latest Rx later (first the framework, and then the implementation improvements). However, by shocking coincidence, I was just today semi-preparing to set-up a savannah libhackerlab project and get it back out there (separately from arch, in which it happens to be included). cool. A nice side effect of that: systas (which I'm not planning on re-releasing anytime soon but which is trivially available in my public archives) has a nice libsystas binding for the latest and greatest rx. It'd probably take like 2hrs at most to port it to guile. [sre example] do it, man. at some point after 1.4.2 i will take (this branch of) guile strict GPL and reap all the goodies out there. thi _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user