From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: hash table handles Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2002 17:49:12 -0800 Sender: guile-user-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: Reply-To: ttn@glug.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1036462791 13875 80.91.224.249 (5 Nov 2002 02:19:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 02:19:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 188tJm-0003bb-00 for ; Tue, 05 Nov 2002 03:19:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 188tJv-0006Cd-00; Mon, 04 Nov 2002 21:19:59 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 188t5a-0004l8-00 for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Nov 2002 21:05:10 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 188t5X-0004kX-00 for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Nov 2002 21:05:08 -0500 Original-Received: from ca-crlsca-cuda3-c6a-b-211.crlsca.adelphia.net ([68.71.15.211] helo=giblet) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 188t5V-0004kI-00 for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Nov 2002 21:05:06 -0500 Original-Received: from ttn by giblet with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 188sq8-0007mj-00; Mon, 04 Nov 2002 17:49:12 -0800 Original-To: prj@po.cwru.edu In-reply-to: (prj@po.cwru.edu) Errors-To: guile-user-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:1330 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user:1330 From: prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc) Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2002 18:56:21 -0500 But the documentation doesn't make it entirely clear whether this is by design, or an accident, and thus whether it might change in the future. using cdr to access the associated data should be fine. i see this: By convention, a handle in a hash table is the pair which associates a key with a value. how would you change this to be more clear? thi _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user