From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: updated $workbook/modules/modules-and-shared-libs.text Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 00:40:44 -0700 Sender: guile-user-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <87hel13q4u.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <874rh04xqy.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> Reply-To: ttn@glug.org NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1022053783 5747 127.0.0.1 (22 May 2002 07:49:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 07:49:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17AQsQ-0001Ua-00 for ; Wed, 22 May 2002 09:49:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17AQo3-0002gw-00; Wed, 22 May 2002 03:45:11 -0400 Original-Received: from ca-crlsbd-u5-c4a-a-172.crlsca.adelphia.net ([24.48.214.172] helo=giblet) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17AQnb-0002Zo-00 for ; Wed, 22 May 2002 03:44:43 -0400 Original-Received: from ttn by giblet with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17AQjk-0002P8-00; Wed, 22 May 2002 00:40:44 -0700 Original-To: rlb@defaultvalue.org In-Reply-To: <874rh04xqy.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> (message from Rob Browning on Tue, 21 May 2002 23:23:01 -0500) Errors-To: guile-user-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:473 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user:473 From: Rob Browning Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 23:23:01 -0500 Not exactly hearsays -- problems I've run in to directly while working on prgrams using guile, guile modules, and shared libraries extensively. i'm not doubting your experience, just your way of sharing it. it's better if you can share experiences directly (as bug reports or other notes under $workbook) than as anecdotal asides. a bug report would be best, because it encourages us to think about and develop testing framework to test for that bug, in addition to providing useful documentation on your experience. if you don't want to be formal, create $workbook/journal/rlb and add notes there. other people can organize the raw data to their needs; all you have to do is make it available (in a precise way) in a place that's easier to get to than requiring a possibly fruitless archive search. asking people to search for specific information wastes their time and shows you didn't value the information enough to use your write privs to their best effect. in the end, how can people trust your judgements if they can't see your methods? thi _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user