Re: GPT-4 knows Guile! :)

[Nala Ginrut <nalaginrut@gmail.com>]

GPT is interesting, to whom may also interested in, I've tried to use GPT
to generate friend error message for compiler.

https://nalaginrut.com/archives/2023/03/12/use%20chatgpt%20for%20compiler%20error%20regeneration



On Mon, Mar 20, 2023, 07:27 Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_bab@web.de>
wrote:

>
> <tomas@tuxteam.de> writes:
>
> > which has tried to be free (in both senses). For images, there is
> > Stable Diffusion (disclaimer:I don't know much about them). For
> > raw data, there's Common Crawl [3], which is Stable Diffusion's
>
> Stable diffusion has one of the most evil licenses I’ve read till now:
> using its images seems to be allowed for almost all proprietary uses,
> but illegal for free culture use. See the explicit questions about that
> here: https://github.com/CompVis/stable-diffusion/issues/131
>
> A license that makes its output only usable for proprietary creations
> but not for free culture is like the polar opposite of the GPL or CC
> by-sa: making a tool that gives proprietary creations an advantage over
> Free Culture.
>
> Some quotes:
>
> > Does this mean that the CreativeML Open RAIL-M license makes output
> > from the model incompatible with copyleft Free Culture and Free
> > Software licenses, so it would for example be illegal to use any of
> > the output in Wikipedia? Is there legal uncertainty about that?
> …
> > The first thing to say is that this license is about as far away from
> > open source as it could possibly get.
> …
> >> "No use of the output can contravene any provision as stated in the
> License.".
>
> > A Japanese lawyer I know told me that, in general terms, releasing
> > output under the CC-BY could be a violation of the license if such a
> > provision exists. (* He is not familiar with this license and has not
> > reviewed it in detail)
>
> No answer from the developers.
>
> Best wishes,
> Arne
> --
> Unpolitisch sein
> heißt politisch sein,
> ohne es zu merken.
> draketo.de
>