From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nala Ginrut Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: debugging guile runtime Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 22:35:20 +0800 Message-ID: References: <20110829125030.GB30079@ccellier.rd.securactive.lan> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf307f3924f2e6f904aba5cdcd X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1314628535 31392 80.91.229.12 (29 Aug 2011 14:35:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 14:35:35 +0000 (UTC) To: rixed@happyleptic.org, guile-user@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 29 16:35:31 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qy2vw-0000kC-7a for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 16:35:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42822 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qy2vv-0006CY-ML for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 10:35:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:46329) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qy2vt-0006CN-Ki for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 10:35:26 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qy2vp-0006FN-Dh for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 10:35:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-vx0-f169.google.com ([209.85.220.169]:35170) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qy2vp-0006Ez-BM for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 10:35:21 -0400 Original-Received: by vxj3 with SMTP id 3so5079902vxj.0 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 07:35:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=vglTQIs2S3KARD9MV8acf9RNyoylojobuQzC9xe55xQ=; b=ifpujdSSGW5DZXRPocMVQ0OAgjP2BoP3ZphQ43A+q+Bn8F4hYZHfmggDSyDMEa2FYC vi820vNxCx6IZNto5LnmULSVHQhIvMXulVx7hRRwg5oyuwmHHc7Gx2XkNAFfzvkaOee/ x2msP0QvgOLVgLLBY3pFFEUBhdRVzQPfKYXhk= Original-Received: by 10.52.69.179 with SMTP id f19mr318444vdu.394.1314628520044; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 07:35:20 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.52.107.3 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 07:35:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110829125030.GB30079@ccellier.rd.securactive.lan> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 209.85.220.169 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:8745 Archived-At: --20cf307f3924f2e6f904aba5cdcd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 8:50 PM, wrote: #4 fork does not close all open files. > well, I got the same question, will fork auto close in Guile or should I close it myself? --20cf307f3924f2e6f904aba5cdcd Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 8:50 PM, <rixed@happyleptic.= org> wrote:

#4 fork does not close all open files.

= well, I got the same question, will fork auto close in Guile or should I cl= ose it myself?=C2=A0
--20cf307f3924f2e6f904aba5cdcd--