I must say NO to NO. You may try http-get directly in this situation and see if it returns. No matter how you handle the values, it never return because of the error I mentioned. On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Ian Price wrote: > Nala Ginrut writes: > > > I'm afraid it's a real bug. > No, it's not. See my response to him. :) > > -- > Ian Price > > "Programming is like pinball. The reward for doing it well is > the opportunity to do it again" - from "The Wizardy Compiled" >