intern a top level variable

intern a top level variable

[Mortimer Cladwell]

Hi,
How do I intern a top level variable? looks like intern-symbol is
deprecated? Is there a substitute? gensym does not seem to be it:

scheme@(guile-user)> (gensym "abc")
$11 = abc2652
scheme@(guile-user)> abc2652
;;; <unknown-location>: warning: possibly unbound variable `abc2652'
ERROR: In procedure module-lookup: Unbound variable: abc2652

Thanks
Mortimer

Re: intern a top level variable

[tomas]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 883 bytes --]

On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 08:41:18AM -0400, Mortimer Cladwell wrote:
> Hi,
> How do I intern a top level variable?

You don't intern variables, you intern symbols (now I guess you
know that, but then: what are you trying to do?)

> looks like intern-symbol is
> deprecated? Is there a substitute? gensym does not seem to be it:

gensym evaluates to an already interned symbol:

  (symbol-interned? (gensym "foo"))
  => #t

> 
> scheme@(guile-user)> (gensym "abc")
> $11 = abc2652

... abc2652 would be an interned symbol here.

> scheme@(guile-user)> abc2652
> ;;; <unknown-location>: warning: possibly unbound variable `abc2652'
> ERROR: In procedure module-lookup: Unbound variable: abc2652

...but it is unbound (i.e. there is no value associated with it). For
this you would have to

  (define abc2652 "foo")

or something similar.

Cheers
-- 
t

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]

Re: Re: intern a top level variable

[Mortimer Cladwell]

I would like to intern and assign a value within a method:

(define (test-intern)
(let* ((name "abc")
       (data "def")
       (name-symbol (gensym name))
       )
  (pretty-print (string-append "symbol: " (symbol->string name-symbol)))
  (set! name-symbol data)))

scheme@(guile-user)> (test-intern)
"symbol: abc3301"
scheme@(guile-user)> abc3301
;;; <unknown-location>: warning: possibly unbound variable `abc3301'
ERROR: In procedure module-lookup: Unbound variable: abc3301

Thanks

Re: Re: intern a top level variable

[Jean Abou Samra]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1215 bytes --]

Le mercredi 16 août 2023 à 10:55 -0400, Mortimer Cladwell a écrit :
> I would like to intern and assign a value within a method:
> 
> (define (test-intern)
> (let* ((name "abc")
>        (data "def")
>        (name-symbol (gensym name))
>        )
>   (pretty-print (string-append "symbol: " (symbol->string name-symbol)))
>   (set! name-symbol data)))
> 
> scheme@(guile-user)> (test-intern)
> "symbol: abc3301"
> scheme@(guile-user)> abc3301
> ;;; <unknown-location>: warning: possibly unbound variable `abc3301'
> ERROR: In procedure module-lookup: Unbound variable: abc3301


Sorry, but it's not clear to me what you mean by "intern and assign a value",
and I don't think it will be clear to someone else.

Can you be more precise please?

I don't understand why you expect "abc3301" to be bound after running (test-
intern). That (test-intern) call just creates a symbol, which is interned as a
symbol, meaning that creating another (interned) symbol with the same name will
reuse the same symbol value. But there is no reason why it shoud be bound to a
variable. Symbol interning just applies to symbols as values, it has nothing to
do with variables.



[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

Re: Re: intern a top level variable

[Mortimer Cladwell]

I would like to define a variable within a method but make it available to
the entire module - globally.
Take a string "abc" convert to a variable (symbol??) abc and set to the
string value "def".
The values of name and data are unknown - they are variable.
In this example the variable (symbol??) abc should evaluate to "def".

Thanks tomas you set me on the correct path. The following works:

(define (test-intern)
(let* ((name "abc")
       (data "def")
       )
   (module-define! (current-module)  (string->symbol name) data))
  )

scheme@(guile-user)> (test-intern)
scheme@(guile-user)> abc
$14 = "def"

So yes I will need to read more about interning.
Thanks
Mortimer



On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 12:13 PM Jean Abou Samra <jean@abou-samra.fr> wrote:

> Le mercredi 16 août 2023 à 10:55 -0400, Mortimer Cladwell a écrit :
>
> I would like to intern and assign a value within a method:
>
> (define (test-intern)
> (let* ((name "abc")
>        (data "def")
>        (name-symbol (gensym name))
>        )
>   (pretty-print (string-append "symbol: " (symbol->string name-symbol)))
>   (set! name-symbol data)))
>
> scheme@(guile-user)> (test-intern)
> "symbol: abc3301"
> scheme@(guile-user)> abc3301
> ;;; <unknown-location>: warning: possibly unbound variable `abc3301'
> ERROR: In procedure module-lookup: Unbound variable: abc3301
>
>
>
> Sorry, but it's not clear to me what you mean by "intern and assign a
> value", and I don't think it will be clear to someone else.
>
> Can you be more precise please?
>
> I don't understand why you expect "abc3301" to be bound after running
> (test-intern). That (test-intern) call just creates a symbol, which is
> interned as a symbol, meaning that creating another (interned) symbol with
> the same name will reuse the same symbol value. But there is no reason why
> it shoud be bound to a variable. Symbol interning just applies to symbols
> as values, it has nothing to do with variables.
>
>
>

Re: intern a top level variable

[Taylan Kammer]

On 16.08.2023 21:17, Mortimer Cladwell wrote:
> I would like to define a variable within a method but make it available to
> the entire module - globally.
> Take a string "abc" convert to a variable (symbol??) abc and set to the
> string value "def".
> The values of name and data are unknown - they are variable.
> In this example the variable (symbol??) abc should evaluate to "def".
> 
> Thanks tomas you set me on the correct path. The following works:
> 
> (define (test-intern)
> (let* ((name "abc")
>        (data "def")
>        )
>    (module-define! (current-module)  (string->symbol name) data))
>   )
> 

The "normal" way to do something like this would be with a macro that takes the
name of the variable to be bound, like so:

  (define-syntax defvar-example
    (syntax-rules ()
      ((_ <name>)
       (define <name> "def"))))

  (defvar-example abc)

  ;; variable abc has now been set to "def"

Is there any particular reason the name has to come from a string in your case?

For example, is the name of the variable only going to be known when the program
has already begun running, and doesn't appear in the initial source code?  That
would be one case where you really have to use 'module-define!' to do it.


(Note: I use pattern variables like <name> out of personal preference; there's no
special meaning to the <> around the name.)

-- 
Taylan

Re: intern a top level variable

[Mortimer Cladwell]

> is the name of the variable only going to be known when the program
has already begun running

yes

the values of name and data will be substringed from an argument passed to
the method at runtime
Thanks
Mortimer

On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 4:35 PM Taylan Kammer <taylan.kammer@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 16.08.2023 21:17, Mortimer Cladwell wrote:
> > I would like to define a variable within a method but make it available
> to
> > the entire module - globally.
> > Take a string "abc" convert to a variable (symbol??) abc and set to the
> > string value "def".
> > The values of name and data are unknown - they are variable.
> > In this example the variable (symbol??) abc should evaluate to "def".
> >
> > Thanks tomas you set me on the correct path. The following works:
> >
> > (define (test-intern)
> > (let* ((name "abc")
> >        (data "def")
> >        )
> >    (module-define! (current-module)  (string->symbol name) data))
> >   )
> >
>
> The "normal" way to do something like this would be with a macro that
> takes the
> name of the variable to be bound, like so:
>
>   (define-syntax defvar-example
>     (syntax-rules ()
>       ((_ <name>)
>        (define <name> "def"))))
>
>   (defvar-example abc)
>
>   ;; variable abc has now been set to "def"
>
> Is there any particular reason the name has to come from a string in your
> case?
>
> For example, is the name of the variable only going to be known when the
> program
> has already begun running, and doesn't appear in the initial source code?
> That
> would be one case where you really have to use 'module-define!' to do it.
>
>
> (Note: I use pattern variables like <name> out of personal preference;
> there's no
> special meaning to the <> around the name.)
>
> --
> Taylan
>
>