From: Daniel Hartwig <mandyke@gmail.com>
To: Panicz Maciej Godek <godek.maciek@gmail.com>
Cc: guile-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: procedure-source availability
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 09:03:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAN3veRcz+xqxorR2rYLATVzsuWcBdx0Pi50ansBHFvwME+PxfA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMFYt2a5zE1Dk2LYmNBy2fx59bcO-Xbn-4nJc3eu74TqCYZS1A@mail.gmail.com>
On 3 October 2012 03:29, Panicz Maciej Godek <godek.maciek@gmail.com> wrote:
> Well, the idea for now is that the associated .spec file containing
> the state of GUI is loaded on startup, and the state of the
> interpreter is dumped to that file on exit (or at GUI's request).
> Viewing the file will obviously be an option (for the curious user),
> but any modifications would probably be overwritten eventually (unless
> the file is write-protected).
You may be interested to see how Smalltalk handles this kind of thing.
IIRC it dumps the complete VM state to disk and reloads. Even
pre-packaged programs are simply VM dumps. To deconstruct and then
reconstruct the running state of a system is quite a complex task.
Keep your own record of source information, etc. when your objects are
instantiated. Associate this with each using object properties (or
similar construct). This way you have any required environment and
precisely the source which generated the object, the user can inspect
this if interested and it can be used to create new instances. As
someone mentioned earlier, the way macros are expanded there is no
single point to define (internal to guile) what is the “source” of a
procedure. However, your system can define this as it has a clear
point of object instantiation.
I have not worked on such a system myself, so am poking around in the
dark here. Good luck :-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-03 1:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-23 19:05 procedure-source availability Panicz Maciej Godek
2012-09-30 20:11 ` Panicz Maciej Godek
2012-10-01 3:40 ` Mark H Weaver
2012-10-01 16:31 ` Panicz Maciej Godek
2012-10-02 14:06 ` Ludovic Courtès
2012-10-02 19:29 ` Panicz Maciej Godek
2012-10-03 1:03 ` Daniel Hartwig [this message]
2012-10-03 16:27 ` Panicz Maciej Godek
2012-10-04 19:40 ` Ludovic Courtès
2012-10-07 0:07 ` Panicz Maciej Godek
2012-10-07 20:36 ` Ludovic Courtès
2012-10-08 20:11 ` Panicz Maciej Godek
2012-10-08 17:57 ` Mark H Weaver
2012-10-04 16:16 ` Ludovic Courtès
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAN3veRcz+xqxorR2rYLATVzsuWcBdx0Pi50ansBHFvwME+PxfA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=mandyke@gmail.com \
--cc=godek.maciek@gmail.com \
--cc=guile-user@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).