From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Panicz Maciej Godek Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Core Guile bindings Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 21:18:06 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1476299929 16683 195.159.176.226 (12 Oct 2016 19:18:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 19:18:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "guile-user@gnu.org" To: "Thompson, David" Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 12 21:18:44 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1buP30-00036v-Em for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 21:18:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35343 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1buP2z-0003xj-6S for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 15:18:37 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57889) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1buP2X-0003v0-4I for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 15:18:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1buP2W-0005Kc-3x for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 15:18:09 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lf0-x231.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c07::231]:36311) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1buP2V-0005KP-QV for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 15:18:08 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-lf0-x231.google.com with SMTP id b75so90494064lfg.3 for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 12:18:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=3i5z6eScjLD/nuS0ONNLUQ5/+IX9dWhFRYq9jyeKAt4=; b=LfWZPdgtBVDmqE9wrSvK2JjhFvO8vV6JRxnykPNAfBO2DyQ67as9/SLS+i4KupeRB4 bnsNflxKTik2ZdYqBxbqlysTeKFKr5JRbkkNVrSZhSqdp50sYIGVVuycWBe1yxqUYAmY RnQUBWWtsS067MIUFqlfmy7R2g4+4t/jUkXokOfCgIK6louDOg2atgx9zNvKRLMxnuGP qtrbiWprDc7I5JpdbNFeukLmojIXOta6JF/MDwUwHvROWyC/LQVLIQ2GZ7CMNX25rTzc Et9fbLWa08GLfs4GZAO4frPa8cILUhdKGK0tMk49vmqXLUWkA24tOC0ZfG4DA2P+mbqQ Mq3Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3i5z6eScjLD/nuS0ONNLUQ5/+IX9dWhFRYq9jyeKAt4=; b=hm6+SxpVo0K1aByZ+jdzbLk4n12tKP9jPcy9YyP0tgkx46K8gMc7aZd/AV6NIvMIcK un+F8Mu9UAQtIyxNREO3gZVWjtGKuot0/UGc9v7HFojy4aRxV3un4QqezUetuQ/ygo3a KRfNVrmbfa/2MCPZIDkMD8xfRLKUqSBWR1Vl/E5FgpJ/c0EFazCj5m4jLNi/S/0IgPsZ R51CgfiJPX5R3M0XSABt0T0DUcnfOB1kGWmLQNZ17PTJ3bUze5wXC6iNo+p5bMZo1Y6C tfGnoKPR4DB3J9ylswLpU0jnNkrJfB+Y1VpRfNXVlwQFhjRlYkXWiX04X32vuxokqi0j A0pg== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RnwEg7AicUtWgk19YXViRrT4S3UZMQ/StxfJY7zB0a2vvhQgGfA7PtZIEhNl5EMuso1LHZbdh9ScFNAlw== X-Received: by 10.194.114.40 with SMTP id jd8mr3802887wjb.191.1476299887001; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 12:18:07 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.80.163.218 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 12:18:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c07::231 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "guile-user" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:12945 Archived-At: 2016-10-12 20:21 GMT+02:00 Thompson, David : > > My understanding is that these symbols have been part of the default > environment for so long that a lot of code would break if they were > removed, so they will be staying for the foreseeable future. > > On the other hand, the fix would usually be trivial (just one use-modules clause), and besides I don't think that Guile has ever had a tradition of worrying too much about backwards compatibility.