From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sunjoong Lee Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: read-header procedure of (web http) module has a bug? Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 08:43:03 +0900 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6daa63712651704be75521a X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1335311018 19685 80.91.229.3 (24 Apr 2012 23:43:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 23:43:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org To: Noah Lavine Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 25 01:43:37 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SMpOQ-0005Ty-4g for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 01:43:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54065 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SMpOP-0005qz-9k for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 19:43:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60403) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SMpOK-0005qi-6e for guile-user@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 19:43:29 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SMpOI-0000GH-KA for guile-user@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 19:43:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wg0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:34381) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SMpOI-0000GD-BQ for guile-user@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 19:43:26 -0400 Original-Received: by wgbds1 with SMTP id ds1so192239wgb.30 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:43:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=/sVrue2+59FHPz5gCwaPStLbhLoAJyNN8j7ffWGW5dg=; b=LtGaL4aMFZdAbamSkgaYW2/bDNOxyFqT+ZU0Dq2wF3MC8YqsmqM88hBzW21cJVzJ9/ G0+wBC4N5hbbTSTx1ZjyeL9gTM+xXjvzfgf7cknwBQRHNfWe1387UV0B8nStM0lT2I7c LQjR5FUJnHMpKnY2nGHlMltBQ7yIFa6M7RD10yBffarxysjhTmUYRUq1AIhC1rF33IfY K/zQZ3ocAJ9DwwkdFZrp9wXf6PSLEY/3yMLa9cqiF9kIE4NLm+tLBfNhpH1iF2mR+8QM h55hOodLczmmVLqNrS3PdTxKgKq8KmhPMX7LtxU/lsXvC0csIM2z4Dk/HRxu1E2gpG+s c1Vw== Original-Received: by 10.216.142.226 with SMTP id i76mr282009wej.28.1335311004230; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:43:24 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.223.93.206 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:43:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 74.125.82.49 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:9388 Archived-At: --0016e6daa63712651704be75521a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Thanks Noah. 2012/4/25 Noah Lavine > Hello, > > That's actually perfectly legal. The procedure definitions at the top > level of a module can all call each other. > > (This also applies to all of the procedures inside a 'let' or similar.) I see. You mean the procedures of the same level can call each other. Right? I have another question; What if the macro case? Suppose there is a procedure to use another macro and definition of the macro is after the procedure, is it illegal? Oh, another one; each procedure call of the same level is legal on other language like Chicken? I'm confused. Thanks. --0016e6daa63712651704be75521a Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks Noah.
2012/4/25 Noah Lavine <noah.b.lavine@gma= il.com>
Hello,

That's actually perfectly legal. The procedure definitions at the top level of a module can all call each other.

(This also applies to all of the procedures inside a 'let' or simil= ar.)

I see. You mean the procedures of the = same level can call each other. Right?

I have anot= her question; What if the macro case?
Suppose there is a procedure to use another macro and definition of th= e macro is after the procedure, is it illegal?

Oh,= another one; each procedure call of the same level is legal on other langu= age like=C2=A0Chicken? I'm confused.

Thanks.
--0016e6daa63712651704be75521a--