Re: SRFI-64 implementation for Guile 2.0

[Sunjoong Lee <sunjoong@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1381 bytes --]

Now, srfi-64.scm works on Guile 1.8 and 2.0.

There are two different thins;
  1) Guile 1.8 does not support nested block comments.
     So, it does not pass srfi-64-test.scm test suite.
     But, comments are comments - not problem.
  2) srfi-64.scm on Guile 2.0 can catch and report the source form
     like this;
       source-file: "srfi-64-test.scm"
       source-line: 129
       source-form: (test-equal "1.1.1. Very simple" (quote (("a") ("b") ()
() () (1 1 0 0 0))) (t))
     srfi-64.scm on Guile 1.8 does not support it yet
     because I'm a newbie of scheme and don't understand Guile yet.
     I hope someone fix these problems;
       a) On Guile 2.0, I used (datum->syntax form (syntax->datum form))
       b) On Guile 2.0, I used (assq-ref (syntax-source form) 'filename)

2012/4/14 Sunjoong Lee <sunjoong@gmail.com>
>
> 2012/4/14 Per Bothner <per@bothner.com>
>
>> This is nice.  It would be great if the Guile port would be merged
>> into the reference implementation, presumably using cond-expand.
>> That way bug-fixes or changes in one could be more easily be
>> merged into the other.
>
>
Now, srfi-64.scm works on Chicken 4.7.

Per Bothner adviced me it's better to merge it into the reference
implementation.
I was not convinced to check right merge.
So, I ported it for Chicken 4.7 and Guile 1.8 - it works now.
Right merge? I'm not sure yet but hope so.

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 2248 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: srfi-64.scm.gz --]
[-- Type: application/x-gzip, Size: 8101 bytes --]