From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Catonano Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: unsigned-int Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2017 11:17:24 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87efuchu4b.fsf@netris.org> <871sqaj3ux.fsf@netris.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1498295881 3935 195.159.176.226 (24 Jun 2017 09:18:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2017 09:18:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org To: Mark H Weaver Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 24 11:17:52 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dOhCS-0000WJ-Cp for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Jun 2017 11:17:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38652 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dOhCX-0007Vg-D0 for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Jun 2017 05:17:57 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43188) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dOhC5-0007VY-6s for guile-user@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Jun 2017 05:17:30 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dOhC4-0003D8-4k for guile-user@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Jun 2017 05:17:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr0-x233.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c0c::233]:33024) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dOhC3-0003Cj-Tb for guile-user@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Jun 2017 05:17:28 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr0-x233.google.com with SMTP id r103so93362683wrb.0 for ; Sat, 24 Jun 2017 02:17:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=WUQxfrzqU9IYU1KPNE6F2Lq7bTC8Bn3fST1i+sgXd/s=; b=Lv/Ht4D0UWRLkJr6xk3RN7P6FuWK1wckvxrcdI8bFCgqUnPiuNoVlnzHCYho8wniRz kDraRvzAV9WZwX2+gNbcEYcBn0tsTIRTnIrsvZDIP6NYP/6R4JjLfvfMYE2CQY/N5GdD IMBlKVVwYzaNwnw3yA9sRIjIT+cDzHLSb0nqhDaQZoRY+3tjWAsmunX2lZds5FzpDrcK zWi4jUKcy4THgHeJ7kEFLJ7yp+nCWrK5/44ktdbpl9/rR3EXwLAO3ELJ7o2v3NJRaJIa KikBytlHnEtMycA/m5QbOb4dSrX+1OyicaAnVCRRnL8wvD3hoSFcF8lOgL7CsC9HHjg1 t8WA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=WUQxfrzqU9IYU1KPNE6F2Lq7bTC8Bn3fST1i+sgXd/s=; b=Nb7l1f1z/EhhNv+qPFilWdr3nteVB9IZKP4TJtJg/77ma9DDAkcOKEC7SQY3gJ1ier j8E+siBgmLIEhQL3JyZBuDfxWA4gjjJVwC0G2bQRgBdVegQDJJ20kv45UT0fBkqroLsB yYo8N8M0wJjaH4ZmQ1NBPSSLrcSPGoiR/N8gz3b9nt7QRcOHnJtX8tArYfmCCUFkn1aF 8N5n9Wpkn8/OFI0czOWbEBSCbs5wujamHlgVVQdZoMwXPTCNydILJo/2jkONEA+v7HnZ MGBDazbpQ5gKjsw83QeA61L4/EKcPPTS66p8I8+NJvhLFSv8cbASaoOHy+gwdb1DeHcE KK7Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOzywXQ3Et//xqbV1f91OZ4I9tILN0c6NH9uKVc+UUTiv87bn9h4 6mLAPDf6EcRREu1e0jOIPxlyUoAUwNiQ X-Received: by 10.80.137.67 with SMTP id f3mr9194746edf.152.1498295845251; Sat, 24 Jun 2017 02:17:25 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.80.131.4 with HTTP; Sat, 24 Jun 2017 02:17:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <871sqaj3ux.fsf@netris.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c0c::233 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "guile-user" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:13876 Archived-At: 2017-06-23 14:16 GMT+02:00 Mark H Weaver : > > No need to apologize. > Cool, tanks :-) > > #vu8(118 0 0 0) represents 118. > > I'm not sure why it's a different number than you're expecting, but I > can tell you that's the number in that bytevector. > I was expecting a different numbr of rows because I opened the spreadsheet with Librreoffice and counted the rows with my eyes In my opinion, tey are not 118. They are way less BUT I tried to run an example C program that comes with Freexl that extracts the same information On most sheets I agree with what tis test program reports Only on 1 of them I disagree The good news is that the numbers that are coming out form my scheme functions are the same numbers that are coming out from the test C program They output the same numbers As for why I disagree on the number of rows on one sheet I don't understand why 118 rows come up. Maybe there are some cells filled with spaces So there's no glitch in my scheme wrap. Not anymore This is all I needed to know Than you Mark.