unofficial mirror of guile-user@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Cowan <cowan-PrmTNUR8zL8@public.gmane.org>
To: scheme-reports-wg2-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
Cc: Per Bothner <per-ENPyne5uQy1BDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
	scheme-reports-wg1-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org,
	 chicken chicken
	<chicken-users-qX2TKyscuCcdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	chibi-scheme-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org,
	 gambit-list-CRDzTM1onBSWkKpYnGOUKg@public.gmane.org,
	guile-user <guile-user-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org>,
	 srfi-160-D5jPTyc31mpbJb6xxNauyti2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: Tangerine Edition penultimate report: how I voted, how you're voting
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2019 16:39:08 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAD2gp_T88mTd2r6y+e_1WOeLioR8cWEND_ZfTkOJ370VQPEcWA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADM5OqP-jNjhJpbAmS7y8ygjtXY=HGc2Dx-qZyee6o0yB+zquA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2530 bytes --]

On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 3:20 PM Ivan Raikov <ivan.g.raikov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:


> Isn't the difference with R6RS that R7RS-large draws extensively on
> SRFIs which are indeed attempts to codify existing practices?
>

SRFIs don't always codify existing practice, including the SRFIs drawn on
in past, present, and future R7RS-large ballots.  The original intention of
the
Steering Committee, I think, had nothing to do with SRFIs; I simply decided
when writing the charter (which the committee approved) to leverage both
existing and to-be-written SRFIs in order to be able to create R7RS-large
piecemeal, which has always seemed to me the only practical approach.

That said, SRFIs often do refer to existing implementations, or
implementations
of languages other than Scheme.


>
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 5:15 PM Per Bothner <per-ENPyne5uQy1BDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >
> > On 1/16/19 6:27 AM, John Cowan wrote:
> > > So what is happening is that people are voting for more rather than
> less, as with the Red Edition.  This encourages me that I'm going in a
> sensible direction with the large language.
> >
> > For the record, I'm extremely leery of the more-is-better approach.
> > We seem to be adding a large number of very large APIs, which seems
> > to be contrary to the Scheme ideal of small well-chosen primitives
> > that work synergistic well together.  People were unhappy with R6RS
> > because of its size and that so much of it was invention rather than
> > codifying existing practice.  R7RS-large is the same - but much more so.
> > --
> >         --Per Bothner
> > per-ENPyne5uQy1BDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org   http://per.bothner.com/
> >
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "scheme-reports-wg2" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to scheme-reports-wg2+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "chibi-scheme" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to chibi-scheme+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To post to this group, send email to chibi-scheme-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/chibi-scheme.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3932 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-01-19 21:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-16 14:27 Tangerine Edition penultimate report: how I voted, how you're voting John Cowan
2019-01-17  0:06 ` John Cowan
2019-01-18  1:14 ` Per Bothner
     [not found]   ` <00545ca8-81d6-d4c5-5acc-142c87457692-ENPyne5uQy1BDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2019-01-18  3:34     ` John Cowan
2019-01-18 20:20   ` Ivan Raikov
     [not found]     ` <CADM5OqP-jNjhJpbAmS7y8ygjtXY=HGc2Dx-qZyee6o0yB+zquA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2019-01-19 21:39       ` John Cowan [this message]
     [not found]         ` <CAD2gp_T88mTd2r6y+e_1WOeLioR8cWEND_ZfTkOJ370VQPEcWA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2019-01-20 13:11           ` [scheme-reports-wg2] " Amirouche Boubekki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAD2gp_T88mTd2r6y+e_1WOeLioR8cWEND_ZfTkOJ370VQPEcWA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=cowan-prmtnur8zl8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=chibi-scheme-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=chicken-users-qX2TKyscuCcdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=gambit-list-CRDzTM1onBSWkKpYnGOUKg@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=guile-user-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=per-ENPyne5uQy1BDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=scheme-reports-wg1-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=scheme-reports-wg2-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=srfi-160-D5jPTyc31mpbJb6xxNauyti2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).