From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Thomas Morley Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: How to make GNU Guile more successful Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2017 15:13:40 +0100 Message-ID: References: <2e4e293e-618e-809a-2eff-31576319ea61@gmx.de> <874lzod28a.fsf@web.de> <6deb1610-e31b-b5c2-e9c9-95a2289af216@gmx.de> <87mvdfs6mh.fsf@web.de> <871sued8h7.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87tw78sj34.fsf@web.de> <87a88zak7v.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1488723255 21506 195.159.176.226 (5 Mar 2017 14:14:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2017 14:14:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 05 15:14:08 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ckWvG-0004NA-Ah for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Sun, 05 Mar 2017 15:14:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38935 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ckWvF-0003l5-Uk for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Sun, 05 Mar 2017 09:14:05 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56307) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ckWuu-0003kz-JY for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Mar 2017 09:13:45 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ckWut-0006Db-Li for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Mar 2017 09:13:44 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-qk0-x22c.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22c]:34811) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ckWus-0006DL-7c; Sun, 05 Mar 2017 09:13:42 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-qk0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id p64so666496qke.1; Sun, 05 Mar 2017 06:13:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=JTaZ/+B+EBfBt0oLyVjKkle56PNkWveNZ51Vaue1ZUc=; b=GoFPAOBW3ky0xfV+WSyDL2kq5uR1MwwaVAaCN7i3+82x5+43vbXbkYm/y0D1uSrouP 0zTjXmyKv8AK5MwpWmnhwkuxStPhBh6O9Ir2wbN0R4/jVgW0oZUbYj8x1zjYHqdH1lH0 PW85Oj18rlMqFTraneVaZJxBIWXLFHkAc81TV1ZVFX1PFZk1sC7BvFWscZ+YdlwWerMo kqFrEc2mH3snVg73z6RNWPzm+Qppb1xvQJmsyJXH1JNkXa4FnRHKQqyW3DuExqZQ4aw+ 2MD95qiXdNOC8mnc+tvQvi5ExknmXYj5F3RAc3JmUDVx1iewoNtb8PK4Fe35fhI1NVsq KnxA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=JTaZ/+B+EBfBt0oLyVjKkle56PNkWveNZ51Vaue1ZUc=; b=taHZ7tpRNlh6H+FsPc3qCSAD/6HG7rWiijn+rfgB/rNeeIo+kxsBx8pp19nu+ACVHp tfQUCHH/356vJXDjaFgQcxF18nt25f24SMSK4dKmiwime5K53sF7Yt+HZF9A5nM+QNEJ prtgr7HCya+OQLVty3F52KPqqBh3DZ1QBlZ4gse8X5pCPgpWUjRacBCrKSyltcLk7tfA frr7doa8V3nb9JFGb8XQ0edNLjDs1VBaQXUI88KXjvAqoh0PZ2F2yR3U1qk5mYRbqg+4 NuRshnErP6LRKETONEHJUgDCgn9Hy0IO9vdQx+sMsLkUhYF1/Guld6B0f23pZyf44Xdx f6cQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39llgAApx6dnVQb/cFbWKIDcAkW81NoVVxMrJqmF3l/HePtq9QtrVvHEi0ttmYTuhr/BY0/NxZmxtdjERg== X-Received: by 10.200.54.207 with SMTP id b15mr12961397qtc.9.1488723221603; Sun, 05 Mar 2017 06:13:41 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.140.89.136 with HTTP; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 06:13:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87a88zak7v.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22c X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "guile-user" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:13410 Archived-At: 2017-03-05 15:09 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup : > Thomas Morley writes: > >> Here some timing values >> >> (1) >> lilypond-2.19.52 using guile 1.8.7 >> (I would have prefered to build lilypond with a guile-1.8.8 build from >> the guile-repository. Though my try to build it from the >> branch_release-1-8 failed. Instead attempting to fix it, I then used a >> released lilypond-version) >> >> real 8m16.191s >> user 6m39.864s >> sys 0m10.860s >> >> (2) >> guile-2.0.14 build from guile-git-repository, branch remotes/origin/stable-2.0 >> lilypond-2.19.56, build from local branch dev/guile-v2.2-work >> >> real 34m11.762s >> user 45m11.316s >> sys 0m5.604s >> >> (3) >> guile-2.1.7 build from guile-git-repository, branch master >> (I've got this warning: >> configure: WARNING: *** GNU Readline is too old on your system. >> configure: WARNING: *** You need readline version 2.1 or later. >> No idea whether this may have an impact on lilyponds compiling-time >> I'll have to test.) >> lilypond-2.19.56, build from local branch dev/guile-v2.2-work >> >> real 67m29.132s >> user 93m14.812s >> sys 0m7.332s > > Same compilation options? Yep. To get comparable results I always did exactly the same, for building the guile-versions as well as for building lilypond. Doing all tests with a fresh restarted computer. Cheers, Harm > This looks like a surprisingly serious > regression compared to 2.0. > > -- > David Kastrup