From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mikael Djurfeldt Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Guile 2 deprecated procedure and SLIB Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 09:40:38 +0100 Message-ID: References: <510C49BE.3060409@gmail.com> <877gmol426.fsf@pobox.com> <87zjzf2p1a.fsf@pobox.com> Reply-To: mikael@djurfeldt.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1360312848 9644 80.91.229.3 (8 Feb 2013 08:40:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 08:40:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user To: Andy Wingo Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 08 09:41:09 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U3jW9-0004EI-7k for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 09:41:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40841 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U3jVq-0000kT-9f for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 03:40:50 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35971) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U3jVj-0000kM-ML for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 03:40:46 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U3jVg-0007M9-1P for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 03:40:43 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ee0-f54.google.com ([74.125.83.54]:49040) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U3jVf-0007Lv-SF for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 03:40:39 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ee0-f54.google.com with SMTP id c41so1840569eek.27 for ; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 00:40:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=DdJnNGVK8BhYTiEI1ICa4KzMQVoKKre+l3KJiG062VE=; b=CpvxsOi5oq4PKKKYOIiJRvm7zTQHnVfWcQLVjUl7r+a+1Cvm7FjKUhNGO0PQ/92iOu GIQV8U/ZgRjZhzIAv/a8ATkvAIcEXCpCZR3JTDF3VnvGk1kBrYeYgdX0hylvvq741z+v CKTq6aoqaZDSRELIbJXnPzTWCNLvYuhwC4ixNu94ULMi6QPeae0eo7vuHPuTw6KWVPYL KhvbnlFBefijAPiV+0sgk7FXmHNDBbWPqhw21hN8r9ZmawPfb3wSIor0zOBn9YxikVj9 9HhVqr/0yJUlOBzxuK6Z6tg1x8m+YxwG1rx91ChQMJ4MaSBDgx6WxBMNaMB/4hHhAfz4 nY1w== X-Received: by 10.14.174.197 with SMTP id x45mr13830687eel.5.1360312838464; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 00:40:38 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.14.225.2 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 00:40:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87zjzf2p1a.fsf@pobox.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: Ia1t1R7bsBX8IxvaWx_1Hm19xn4 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 74.125.83.54 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:10040 Archived-At: On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Andy Wingo wrote: > On Thu 07 Feb 2013 21:50, Mikael Djurfeldt writes: > >> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Andy Wingo wrote: >>> On Sat 02 Feb 2013 00:03, Andrew Bernard writes: >>> >>>> In the latest top CVS of SLIB (as of Feb 2013), with Guile 2.0.7, the >>>> procedure used in the common lisp time section decode-universal-time use >>>> the deprecated procedure list->uniform-array. >>> >>> Perhaps Mikael would like to patch this one up? :-) >> >> Sorry... I do not feel any responsibility for the current slib >> interface and I don't know the common lisp time section of slib. > > Apologies for presuming. I thought you mentioned you wanted to do > something about the guile, slib, and uniform arrays; the use of > list->uniform-array is there. My mistake! No, you're right. I looked back at the thread and I clearly had the intention to do something about the uniform arrays. I had forgotten this! :-) As I explained previously, I had intended to do this when I had some time around Christmas. Now I don't have time. :( So, while I'll keep it in mind and have a go at it when the moment comes, I wouldn't recommend anyone to rely on this. I guess the support for the new arrays should go into the guil.init file in slib, right? Anyway, I *am* doing some work-related stuff in scmutils and can work on that. Best regards, Mikael D.