From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mikael Djurfeldt Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: mailmam, web bridge, forum, p2p (was: Diversification) Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 13:30:14 +0200 Message-ID: References: <-IsD5PBFie-kW2VJSYNHx00LodtSHflKNWtY2vjNVQDN126iTMsqHrdxl8zeWE8a53TzM_27wskjsrylIh4bN5jIGVNYOBC6zmE3p1RGyBg=@protonmail.com> <20191023064813.6igo2qi2cwtcz5bz@pelzflorian.localdomain> <20191023113724.bf055453852ec206af8d7bef@gmail.com> <20191023112544.5s65wrzbexnlsj22@pelzflorian.localdomain> <20191023123343.wanooc44orpyo7tk@pelzflorian.localdomain> <20191024133242.GA22930@tuxteam.de> Reply-To: mikael@djurfeldt.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="37235"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: Andy Wingo , guile-user To: Nala Ginrut Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 25 13:31:00 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iNxo3-0009VO-R5 for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 13:30:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58764 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iNxo1-0001kg-T1 for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 07:30:57 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43926) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iNxnZ-0001gv-4Q for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 07:30:30 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iNxnX-0002Rd-Mm for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 07:30:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-vs1-f66.google.com ([209.85.217.66]:46241) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iNxnX-0002RZ-IM for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 07:30:27 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-vs1-f66.google.com with SMTP id x20so1176417vso.13 for ; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 04:30:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=rdyRxxBXxoXIGWHno8rdckPQex5l2Ru3pMvn/9lyZO0=; b=nfD2t+PfDN1wDMTej624FU5qEWSuCVQNVYJ0cbc6i9EpZsf/PprXkqz2dMIjxtiGyJ M+YXqxV+/Ag83Wb8zUUCM2ZngiZvzK0ZihqYDgucfy/ZjlJJShhSfmYqKS9oi3bntfep VCNOQxKn9eE+uJ0+ANFJLNes8xwXMHw9R1vqqDopeT10P9ec3Oix2KhEKYLxz7crNR2W OE30qxWFi2bsgPndy/PjhhkCfF6HHKxoCK4ahCddoRfUW1QvZEu7UkuQpsN7KEoKczlv lrW0gUXYTflTSWSQW606whqKmDxUqFh/EUORzi6dZqPcW+U+GEfS6EfuXhAtXn3M42+r kgNg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX5OLbJlS3PuPLKRJYk62ulYQO/zWOa+1ceCvxeLb4ScAEqam2F ewiksvJ/6//kvmD4UJmQYXBCyugrmRnmT4nckw4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw1SnN9TVVVao5GQ2S6D2cVivPGbjR3DppxNUYpCcjdCNgoVSCdmiQ9eDw+5KXlBO8BHQh0UNi21GyD2eP5Mmk= X-Received: by 2002:a67:fb0f:: with SMTP id d15mr1618256vsr.212.1572003026466; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 04:30:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.217.66 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "guile-user" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:15839 Archived-At: It would be nice to be able to run scheme code in the client: https://github.com/google/schism They mention "the Webassembly GC proposal". :) Maybe some day, the Guile compiler could emit WASM? That would mean supporting multiple VMs. Mikael Den tors 24 okt. 2019 18:16Nala Ginrut skrev: > I've ever tried to write a site for our local community without any JS > code, all auxiliary features include simple animation are implemented wit= h > CSS. > However, I have to say it's painful to write a more complex site. I don't > know if there's any framework for that. I'm too lazy to write all things > manually. But I recommend you try it if you never did. It's interesting. > > Best regards. > > > =E4=BA=8E 2019=E5=B9=B410=E6=9C=8824=E6=97=A5=E5=91=A8= =E5=9B=9B 22:58=E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > > > On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 11:35:52AM +0200, Amirouche Boubekki wrote: > > > Le jeu. 24 oct. 2019 =C3=A0 03:01, Nala Ginrut = a > > =C3=A9crit : > > > > [...] > > > > > Last time I checked the security requirements for web application tha= t > > > do not rely on JavaScript was too complicated. I preferred to forget > > > about it. > > > > > > See > > > https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Cross-Site_Request_Forgery= _Prevention_Cheat_Sheet.html > > > > Now this is interesting. I still dream of an "application" > > which is viable (perhaps with some restrictions) without > > any javascript (as Wikipedia and relatives do, BTW). So > > I'm interested in such things as above... > > > > Cheers > > -- tom=C3=A1s > > >