From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Didier Godefroy Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Building guile 1.8.6 on Tru64 5.1b Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:19:35 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1240665855.3133.197.camel@localhost.localdomain> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1240669209 20554 80.91.229.12 (25 Apr 2009 14:20:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 14:20:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "guile-user@gnu.org" , Ludovic =?ISO-8859-1?B?Q291cnTocw==?= To: Mike Gran Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 25 16:21:29 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Lxiky-0005BH-Na for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:21:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55983 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LxijZ-0005cC-3X for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 Apr 2009 10:20:01 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LxijV-0005bY-0b for guile-user@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Apr 2009 10:19:57 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LxijQ-0005al-6d for guile-user@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Apr 2009 10:19:56 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=51935 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LxijQ-0005ai-4Q for guile-user@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Apr 2009 10:19:52 -0400 Original-Received: from orbhost.com ([207.218.123.239]:2823 helo=orbhost.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LxijK-0000NO-NF; Sat, 25 Apr 2009 10:19:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.20] (98.76.69-86.rev.gaoland.net [86.69.76.98]) by orbhost.net (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id n3PEJgJH170056; Sat, 25 Apr 2009 10:19:43 -0400 (EDT) User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.17.0.090302 Thread-Topic: Building guile 1.8.6 on Tru64 5.1b Thread-Index: AcnFsNvXZzbSwD39dkOm+0hZCDrgew== In-Reply-To: <1240665855.3133.197.camel@localhost.localdomain> X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:7262 Archived-At: on 4/25/09 3:24 PM, Mike Gran at spk121@yahoo.com uttered the following: > On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 14:29 +0200, Didier Godefroy wrote: >>> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guile.git/log/?h=branch_release-1-8 >> >> I simply removed that @LTLIBINTL@ from that Makefile and re-ran the make to >> allow the build to be successful then I ran the tests, and the numbers.test >> does fail. However I still went ahead with the install, hoping it wouldn't >> bother my build of autogen. I tried with autogen 5.5.7 and now 5.9.7 and get >> the same errors of unresolved symbols scm_makstr and gh_eval_str which seem >> to be guile related. I couldn't find anything useful to fix this while >> googling, so I'm back to the guile list. > Those two functions do exist in Guile 1.8.6, but, they may not get built > in if you configured with the --disable-deprecated option. > > So, if you've been building guile with ./configure --disable-deprecated, > then that is your problem. If that isn't it, then you could try > explicitly enabling them by using ./configure --enable-deprecated. That worked!!! Geez! That was so simple and I found no such info by googling. Hopefully this time being on the mailing list someone with this same issue will find that info. One small detail though, the detected version of guile is 1.4 but what I built should be showing something like 1.8.6 right? Trying to build autogen again now, the configure finally succeeded. -- Didier Godefroy mailto:dg@ulysium.net