From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Neil Jerram Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: new sqlite binding Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 09:50:01 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87r5e51u4n.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <877hfqemcq.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64dda78aa5faa0496ceedd1 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1291715517 24512 80.91.229.12 (7 Dec 2010 09:51:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 09:51:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Andy Wingo , guile-user , Neil Jerram To: linasvepstas@gmail.com Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 07 10:51:51 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PPuD7-0005sJ-FI for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 10:51:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48338 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PPuD6-0003W6-PU for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 04:51:48 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=35211 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PPuBU-00037J-1c for guile-user@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 04:50:12 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PPuBP-0004BK-1D for guile-user@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 04:50:07 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-qy0-f176.google.com ([209.85.216.176]:53303) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PPuBO-0004BE-V2 for guile-user@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 04:50:02 -0500 Original-Received: by qyk10 with SMTP id 10so14899030qyk.0 for ; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 01:50:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=AbPn/BMAtuwuRH3ckgh75iOrjFfkvzWfyBgfgXP6b78=; b=uGEpg5Sm6xWBOdrU96QeIdAGB/+Y39VFsxPyRKbqQgivsfYPwUo0ErU6FR7dmg0bYJ HWjvQe6JvwkLGvSjee5/zQgT4ZRvUSCAyRWtuGIts7snishRMDftIf2fpTJDGT9MCtNk 2s1uLa41ZeaAxQKNmftA9UhsyhB3dF4CTyq80= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=kH5PxIZw4y3aTHqmDlKcDDmYxSecrf/d3/D5YoMDHJFeRVbaIBsCqiX6XPUNZXkZlp fV6nXqot/2F7d2aPSGd0sxDqKMDI67NIpUZvJQgVXH3z8KBodVYkNwFejbyAP/ulqXYP t/PdENKZKOkLEQkOAnk4dGTUV6Q+hArvuxrj0= Original-Received: by 10.229.235.143 with SMTP id kg15mr3696355qcb.226.1291715401637; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 01:50:01 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.229.192.211 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 01:50:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:8297 Archived-At: --0016e64dda78aa5faa0496ceedd1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On 7 December 2010 04:46, Linas Vepstas wrote: > Would g-wrap work? I remember g-wrap was written about 10 years ago, > back when swig didn't work so well, and certainly didn't work well with > guile. But I had the impression that g-wrap went defunct. Not sure. > > (what do I know? for all I know, maybe g-wrap morphed into ffi). > > As far as I know, g-wrap is still active, and part of the dev chain for guile-gnome. Neil --0016e64dda78aa5faa0496ceedd1 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 7 December 2010 04:46, Linas Vepstas = <linasvepsta= s@gmail.com> wrote:
Would g-wrap work? =A0I remember g-wrap was written about 1= 0 years ago,
back when swig didn't work so well, and certainly didn't work well = with
guile. =A0But I had the impression that g-wrap went defunct. Not sure.

(what do I know? for all I know, maybe g-wrap morphed into ffi).


As far as I know, = g-wrap is still active, and part of the dev chain for guile-gnome.

= =A0 =A0 =A0=A0 Neil
=A0

--0016e64dda78aa5faa0496ceedd1--