From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Julian Graham Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: [r6rs] quest to make the makers package work Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 08:48:36 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87bpbmos7x.fsf@rapitore.luna> <878w6e9ke0.fsf@rapitore.luna> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1276865334 23910 80.91.229.12 (18 Jun 2010 12:48:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 12:48:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org To: Andy Wingo Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 18 14:48:51 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OPb06-0001Fj-I7 for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:48:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39714 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OPb05-0004Dp-Jb for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 08:48:49 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=42250 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OPazv-0004B3-M2 for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 08:48:41 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OPazu-0000t1-H3 for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 08:48:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-iw0-f169.google.com ([209.85.214.169]:49949) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OPazu-0000sp-DK for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 08:48:38 -0400 Original-Received: by iwn35 with SMTP id 35so1291575iwn.0 for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 05:48:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=TOCzxH/XSglt2k76egdlruG0ekhVeUj4s5ooTXIHKTQ=; b=e46VUDneyrcYVsuKOpCbjT0+ZL41mM16NHir1Pvxt8T5DY04rPtnvmCjVPnzGAmkLN WfvVF8c82Xcd/dChARHvyNdM/bII2Pv0aBOS3LeASa2SsVfhP4ULrmXE89T9VXILRMwB KelqPmAgXjE9E+zegNOhxZdwHtgm1tiSuAM5M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=a8WtQkxWwIpRVKfq2QCSxyuLhmn6hw90UcJMwwvR2Ex1w6HoVQNDOeiWw8Jrv3pkWC 7VUavS/FkRpW9eRhTPkxMehth5FvEK9MUI1QjSaZWprS/PTq7+t3H+d/QH1XlD/1V17N VSYLMJX2beeNNsXfiDVWM8eJ0u/U8RDWEvizA= Original-Received: by 10.231.120.137 with SMTP id d9mr1227639ibr.97.1276865316920; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 05:48:36 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.231.172.137 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 05:48:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:7892 Archived-At: Hello! >> ;;; compiling ./makers//makers.sls >> ;;; compiling ./makers//helpers.sls >> ;;; compiled /home/marco/.cache/guile/ccache/2.0-0.R-LE-4/home/marco/src/devel/scheme/makers/makers/helpers.sls.go >> ;;; compiled /home/marco/.cache/guile/ccache/2.0-0.R-LE-4/home/marco/src/devel/scheme/makers/makers/makers.sls.go >> ;;; compiled /home/marco/.cache/guile/ccache/2.0-0.R-LE-4/home/marco/src/devel/scheme/makers/tests/test-makers.sps.go >> guile: uncaught throw to r6rs:exception: (#) >> make: *** [gtest] Error 1 > > Yes this is where I am now. I don't know much about our r6rs condition shims... I haven't been following this thread as closely as I should, but FWIW, that's the result of a call to R6RS's `raise' (or `raise-continuable') -- Guile's default throw handler doesn't know how to unpack it. For debugging, you might try installing an R6RS exception handler at the top level. I'll also jump in and take a look. Regards, Julian