From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: No Itisnt Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: char-set-contains? and # Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 22:24:46 -0500 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1275017108 13117 80.91.229.12 (28 May 2010 03:25:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 03:25:08 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-user@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 28 05:25:06 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OHqBy-00058R-88 for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 May 2010 05:25:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55306 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OHqBx-0007NU-J7 for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 May 2010 23:25:01 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=42517 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OHqBr-0007JU-78 for guile-user@gnu.org; Thu, 27 May 2010 23:24:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OHqBq-0001IY-8x for guile-user@gnu.org; Thu, 27 May 2010 23:24:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qy0-f187.google.com ([209.85.221.187]:34612) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OHqBq-0001IU-4L for guile-user@gnu.org; Thu, 27 May 2010 23:24:54 -0400 Original-Received: by qyk17 with SMTP id 17so1017267qyk.12 for ; Thu, 27 May 2010 20:24:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=kt7+I0gbh3Jbhl9pTjdrsQNzt0NnLdfkWV8iIiEOHTg=; b=ofX5SlnN5vslv/2rawHIK79eDJpo162JwoVz/3WWII2agfxyCNWxnEWuwf1euwHhF/ 7GQT+iJlDf+rjl+LiTQoOAwfEwPH9oMtHPh0Mro1N2OtDGf4uUJ9sZnH2SZsvV9bP0+R y9QlxsyWJ921hEenteRY32a4AUSsAHenBpf74= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=TiLka37AUjcDijCjyL4ByIsPFxnLuNZ6hL2bUYrzwJBC8WoQIRWmva9GY33rkiZ0Kh Px91CHnwbKiQ+/qEtItmA+7gGG18rN97ycfvbxJe8jn5YXCYbwfyTU2MgrLEnhFv7CIG ApLdBbRl7CDXgep/thoSFWxTfz7iBSNX2QtGA= Original-Received: by 10.224.19.9 with SMTP id y9mr6209377qaa.353.1275017087498; Thu, 27 May 2010 20:24:47 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.229.232.199 with HTTP; Thu, 27 May 2010 20:24:46 -0700 (PDT) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:7805 Archived-At: It's getting pretty annoying that char-set-contains? rejects #. Is there a way around this without wrapping it myself? Is that behavior intended? Because to me, it seems like it'd be more reasonable to return #f when passed #.