From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: MJ Ray Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 06:51:42 -1100 Organization: My own Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <9c7657eb40067294c61d7bcfcf86dbed@bouncing.localnet> References: <87bryqmu5h.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Generated by Pantomime 1.0.99) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1051552345 18725 80.91.224.249 (28 Apr 2003 17:52:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 17:52:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 28 19:52:23 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19ACmc-0004kw-00 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 19:51:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 19ACnV-0007O3-02 for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 13:52:13 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 19ACn6-0007E0-00 for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 13:51:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 19ACmu-00072I-00 for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 13:51:36 -0400 Original-Received: from shockwave.systems.pipex.net ([62.241.160.9]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 19ACmE-0006T3-00 for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 13:50:54 -0400 Original-Received: from bouncing.localnet (81-86-163-141.dsl.pipex.com [81.86.163.141]) by shockwave.systems.pipex.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23E6716000896; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 18:50:53 +0100 (BST) Original-Received: by bouncing.localnet (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D80155B54B; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 18:51:42 +0100 (BST) Original-To: Rob Browning In-Reply-To: <87bryqmu5h.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> X-Mailer: GNUMail.app (Version 1.0.99) X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:1858 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user:1858 On 2003-04-28 18:03:22 +0100 Rob Browning wrote: > Well that sounds like a pretty good argument in favor of pregexp -- > I'll look in to it. Of course we can only include it in guile-core > (without a rewrite) if the author's amenable to the LGPL and copyright > assignment. If pregexp *is* suitable, I can probably handle improving > the performance. I'll ask the author. As I said, pregexp is included in PLT-Scheme, which is also LGPL. I think the only new ground is copyright assignment. [...] > Should be. Ideally, that might be encouraged via a suitable SRFI. > Wonder if pregexp might be appropriate... Let's see what people say here for a bit and what the author's response is, then cls, then SRFI? -- MJR http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ IM: slef@jabber.at This is my home web site. This for Jabber Messaging. How's my writing? Let me know via any of my contact details. _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user