From: "Linus Björnstam" <linus.internet@fastmail.se>
To: "Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" <arne_bab@web.de>,
"Guile User Mailing List" <guile-user@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Syntax-Case macro that selects the N-th element from a list
Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2021 15:40:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8e6a1a19-c857-44c2-b5ea-3801f9366677@www.fastmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <00426c84-76ad-43b3-99ca-4b8e345d6725@www.fastmail.com>
That "syntax-rules" is of course syntax-case.
Try writing it first with unhygienic macros and get that working before porting to syntax-case if you don't know the ins-and-outs of syntax-case.
--
Linus Björnstam
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021, at 14:21, Linus Björnstam wrote:
> Can you use the procedural part of syntax-rules? You have the power of
> using scheme at expansion time, which means you could do list-ref all
> you want.
>
> The only thing is that guile lacks syntax->list, so sometimes you have
> to manually turn it into a list. Say you are matching ((_ stuff ...)
> Body) stuff is a syntax object. You could turn it into a list of syntax
> objects by doing #'(stuff ...). Then you can treat it as a regular
> list, and use quasisyntax to put it back into your output syntax.
>
> Writing this on my phone. Sorry for the brevity (and lack of code).
>
> --
> Linus Björnstam
>
> On Mon, 5 Apr 2021, at 13:30, Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > In dryads-wake I need selection of the element in a list in a macro from
> > user-input. Currently I have multiple macros, and the correct one (which
> > strips the non-selected choices) is selected in a simple cond:
> >
> > (define-syntax-rule (Choose resp . choices)
> > "Ask questions, apply consequences"
> > (cond
> > ((equal? resp 1) ;; resp is user-input. It is a natural number.
> > (Respond1 choices))
> > ((equal? resp 2)
> > (Respond2 choices))
> > ((equal? resp 3)
> > (Respond3 choices))
> > (else
> > #f)))
> >
> > For this however I have three syntax-case macros:
> >
> > (define-syntax Respond1
> > (lambda (x)
> > (syntax-case x ()
> > ((_ ((question consequences ...) choices ...))
> > #`(begin
> > (respond consequences ...)))
> > ((_ (choices ...))
> > #`(begin #f)))))
> >
> > (define-syntax Respond2
> > (lambda (x)
> > (syntax-case x ()
> > ((_ (choice choices ...))
> > #`(begin
> > (Respond1 (choices ...))))
> > ((_ (choices ...))
> > #`(begin #f)))))
> >
> > (define-syntax Respond3
> > (lambda (x)
> > (syntax-case x ()
> > ((_ (a b choices ...))
> > #`(Respond1 (choices ...)))
> > ((_ (choices ...))
> > #`(begin #f)))))
> >
> >
> > I would like to get rid of those three definitions and replace them by
> > at most two (one that strips N initial list entries, and Respond1).
> >
> > I cannot move to procedures, because I have code that must be executed
> > only during final processing, and when I evaluate any of the
> > consequences (as it happens with procedure-arguments), then the timing
> > of the code execution does not match anymore. So I must absolutely do
> > this in macros.
> >
> >
> > I’ve tried to get that working, but all my tries failed. Is there a way
> > and can you show it to me?
> >
> > This is a minimal working example. The output should stay the same,
> > except for part 4, which needs this change to work (see at the bottom),
> > but I would like to:
> >
> > - replace Respond2 and Respond3 by something recursive, so resp can have
> > arbitrary high values (not infinite: max the length of the options) and
> > - replace the cond-clause by a call to the recursive macro.
> >
> > (define-syntax-rule (respond consequence consequence2 ...)
> > (begin
> > (write consequence)
> > (when (not (null? '(consequence2 ...)))
> > (write (car (cdr (car `(consequence2 ...))))))))
> >
> > (define-syntax Respond1
> > (lambda (x)
> > (syntax-case x ()
> > ((_ ((question consequences ...) choices ...))
> > #`(begin
> > (respond consequences ...)))
> > ((_ (choices ...))
> > #`(begin #f)))))
> >
> > (define-syntax Respond2
> > (lambda (x)
> > (syntax-case x ()
> > ((_ (choice choices ...))
> > #`(begin
> > (Respond1 (choices ...))))
> > ((_ (choices ...))
> > #`(begin #f)))))
> >
> > (define-syntax Respond3
> > (lambda (x)
> > (syntax-case x ()
> > ((_ (a b choices ...))
> > #`(Respond1 (choices ...)))
> > ((_ (choices ...))
> > #`(begin #f)))))
> >
> >
> > (define-syntax-rule (Choose resp . choices)
> > "Ask questions, apply consequences"
> > (cond
> > ((equal? resp 1)
> > (Respond1 choices))
> > ((equal? resp 2)
> > (Respond2 choices))
> > ((equal? resp 3)
> > (Respond3 choices))
> > (else
> > #f)))
> >
> >
> > (display "Choose 1: should be bar:")
> > (Choose 1 (foo 'bar) (foo 'war 'har) (foo 'mar) (foo 'tar))
> > (newline)
> > (display "Choose 2: should be warhar:")
> > (Choose 2 (foo 'bar) (foo 'war 'har) (foo 'mar) (foo 'tar))
> > (newline)
> > (display "Choose 3: should be mar:")
> > (Choose 3 (foo 'bar) (foo 'war 'har) (foo 'mar) (foo 'tar))
> > (newline)
> > (display "Choose 4: should be tar:")
> > (Choose 4 (foo 'bar) (foo 'war 'har) (foo 'mar) (foo 'tar))
> > (newline)
> > (display "Choose 5: should be #f:")
> > (Choose 5 (foo 'bar) (foo 'war 'har) (foo 'mar) (foo 'tar))
> > (newline)
> >
> >
> > Best wishes,
> > Arne
> > --
> > Unpolitisch sein
> > heißt politisch sein
> > ohne es zu merken
> >
> > Attachments:
> > * signature.asc
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-05 13:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-05 11:30 Syntax-Case macro that selects the N-th element from a list Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
2021-04-05 12:21 ` Linus Björnstam
2021-04-05 13:40 ` Linus Björnstam [this message]
2021-04-05 16:24 ` Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
2021-04-05 13:51 ` Tim Van den Langenbergh
2021-04-05 15:08 ` Taylan Kammer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8e6a1a19-c857-44c2-b5ea-3801f9366677@www.fastmail.com \
--to=linus.internet@fastmail.se \
--cc=arne_bab@web.de \
--cc=guile-user@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).