From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sebastien.deMentendeHorne@electrabel.com Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: stupid mail about letrec Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 18:22:51 +0100 Sender: guile-user-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <8D1414482878D4119AEE00508B6C9074089662B9@seacex02.eib.electrabel.be> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Generated by NET-TEL Mailguard SMTP version 3.5.6.5) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1016731541 17834 127.0.0.1 (21 Mar 2002 17:25:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 17:25:41 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16o6Jo-0004dX-00 for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2002 18:25:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16o6IJ-0002Z1-00; Thu, 21 Mar 2002 12:24:07 -0500 Original-Received: from mailrelay-drp.electrabel.be ([194.29.97.133] helo=seebmr02) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16o6HG-0002Us-00 for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2002 12:23:02 -0500 Original-Received: from seebex05.eib.electrabel.be (SEEBEX05.EIB.ELECTRABEL.COM [171.26.236.55]) by seebmr02 (3.05.5.2) with ESMTP id TAA27623 for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2002 19:20:03 +0200 Original-Received: by seebex05.eib.electrabel.be with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 21 Mar 2002 18:22:52 +0100 Original-To: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Errors-To: guile-user-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:49 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user:49 sorry... have confused letrec and let* (in fact, csi (chicken interpreter) and = scheme (MIT-scheme interpreter, i guess)) gave me the solution I was expecting = with letrec). Is letrec supposed to have at least the same effect of let* ? S=E9bastien de Menten | ELECTRABEL=20 Tel: ++32 10 48 51 76 | Quantitative Analysis,=20 Fax: ++32 10 48 51 09 | Place de l'universit=E9, 16, = 4=E8me =E9tage Gsm: ++32 478 789 444 | B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, BELGIUM = _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user