From: Matt Wette <matt.wette@gmail.com>
To: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>
Cc: Guile User <guile-user@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: problems with syntax-case and with-syntax
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 05:50:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <89D4027A-4E40-4CC0-9C14-4C4974E9AF96@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <33BDE2DC-09AB-4DBF-AD42-9929CE936F79@gmail.com>
> On Sep 18, 2017, at 6:16 AM, Matt Wette <matt.wette@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Aug 27, 2017, at 6:35 PM, Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org> wrote:
>>
>> Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org> writes:
>>
>>> The problem is that in Guile 2.2, whenever (define <id> ...) is found in
>>> the expanded code, where <id> was introduced by a macro (i.e. not passed
>>> as an explicit argument to the macro), Guile will rewrite the <id> into
>>> a new name based on the hash of the entire definition form.
>>
>> I forgot to mention that only top-level definitions are munged in this
>> way.
>>
>> Also, my parenthetical definition of what it means to be "introduced by
>> a macro" lacked precision. To avoid <id> being "introduced by a macro",
>> it's not enough for <id> to have been passed an argument to the macro
>> that generated the definition. If that were the case, you could work
>> around this by adding an additional layer of macros, where the upper
>> layer generated <id> and passed it down to the lower layer which would
>> generate the definition.
>>
>> To avoid <id> being considered "introduced by a macro", <id> must
>> ultimately occur verbatim in the source code outside of any macro
>> template.
>
> I have read through the posts, and the Guile 2.2 ref manual. The explanations
> are not quite complete in my mind. If all top-level id's introduced by macros
> were munged, then it would break a lot of existing code. See, for example,
> the `define-structure' example in "The Scheme Programming Language", 4th ed.
> It seems identifiers introduced by datum->syntax are preserved, as long
> as they are not redefined. Is that correct?
>
> In my case, I was redefining by architecture (or convention). I was generating
> "wrap-" + <identifier> in a macro that called a another macro that made the same
> definition. Is it bad form to assume an convention like this?
>
> Off to do more reading on this: Dybvig's paper on syntax-case and I have the
> book too. and R6RS ...
I have been convinced that introducing top-level definitions is bad form, so I will
be removing datum->syntax calls but stuffing some procedures into the associated
struct, I think. So instead of
(define-fh-type foo_t)
...
(unwrap-foo_t obj)
I will use
(define-fh-type foo_t
foo_t? make-foo_t)
...
(fh-unwrap foo_t obj)
Matt
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-20 12:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-27 20:18 problems with syntax-case and with-syntax Matt Wette
2017-08-28 0:36 ` Mark H Weaver
2017-08-28 1:35 ` Mark H Weaver
2017-09-18 13:16 ` Matt Wette
2017-09-20 12:50 ` Matt Wette [this message]
2017-08-28 3:48 ` Matt Wette
2017-08-28 3:50 ` Matt Wette
2017-08-28 11:38 ` Chris Vine
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=89D4027A-4E40-4CC0-9C14-4C4974E9AF96@gmail.com \
--to=matt.wette@gmail.com \
--cc=guile-user@gnu.org \
--cc=mhw@netris.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).