From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rob Browning Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 13:18:02 -0500 Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <87znmalc4l.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> References: <9c7657eb40067294c61d7bcfcf86dbed@bouncing.localnet> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1051553876 27138 80.91.224.249 (28 Apr 2003 18:17:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 18:17:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 28 20:17:51 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19ADCI-00072d-00 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 20:17:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 19ADCx-0004Vt-03 for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 14:18:31 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 19ADCW-0004SE-00 for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 14:18:04 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 19ADCV-0004QW-00 for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 14:18:04 -0400 Original-Received: from dsl093-098-016.wdc1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.98.16] helo=defaultvalue.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 19ADCV-0004PZ-00 for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 14:18:03 -0400 Original-Received: from raven.i.defaultvalue.org (raven.i.defaultvalue.org [192.168.1.7]) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 649F28D3; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 13:18:02 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by raven.i.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 511662150F7; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 13:18:02 -0500 (CDT) Original-To: MJ Ray In-Reply-To: <9c7657eb40067294c61d7bcfcf86dbed@bouncing.localnet> (MJ Ray's message of "Mon, 28 Apr 2003 06:51:42 -1100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.3 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:1861 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user:1861 MJ Ray writes: >> Should be. Ideally, that might be encouraged via a suitable SRFI. >> Wonder if pregexp might be appropriate... > > Let's see what people say here for a bit and what the author's > response is, then cls, then SRFI? He's fine with the assignment if we need one. I'll play around with the code. -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org Previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user