From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludovic.courtes@laas.fr (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Anyone relying on "break-at" breakpoints? Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:10:59 +0200 Organization: LAAS-CNRS Message-ID: <87zly613fw.fsf@laas.fr> References: <874pgej3r1.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1193400743 18581 80.91.229.12 (26 Oct 2007 12:12:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 12:12:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Guile Users To: Neil Jerram Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 26 14:12:25 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IlO33-0000P7-UN for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:12:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IlO2u-0004ts-IF for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 08:12:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IlO1g-0004DF-MX for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 08:10:56 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IlO1e-0004BW-GX for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 08:10:55 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IlO1e-0004B9-77 for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 08:10:54 -0400 Original-Received: from laas.laas.fr ([140.93.0.15]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IlO1d-0001M7-Q6 for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 08:10:54 -0400 Original-Received: from messiaen.laas.fr (messiaen [IPv6:2001:660:6602:0:230:65ff:fed4:9d20]) by laas.laas.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id l9QCAp1g024815; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:10:51 +0200 (MEST) Original-Received: by messiaen.laas.fr (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:10:59 +0200 X-URL: http://www.laas.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 5 Brumaire an 216 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEB1F5364 X-PGP-Key: http://www.laas.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 821D 815D 902A 7EAB 5CEE D120 7FBA 3D4F EB1F 5364 X-OS: powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu Mail-Followup-To: Neil Jerram , Guile Users In-Reply-To: <874pgej3r1.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> (Neil Jerram's message of "Thu\, 25 Oct 2007 22\:14\:42 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -0.001 () NO_RELAYS X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang at CNRS-LAAS on IPv6:2001:660:6602::2 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:6239 Archived-At: Hi Neil, Disclaimer: I'm not too familiar with the debugging infrastructure and I've never used `break-at'. But... Neil Jerram writes: > By way of contrast, the other kind of breakpoint ("break-in") does not > suffer from this problem, because it is defined in a way that relates > more persistently to the code (even as the code changes). A break-in > breakpoint is defined as > > break-in [] > > and means break at the start of that procedure. That looks nice (I suppose it could also perform better than `scan-source-whash'), but would "let" count as a in your example? If so, how could we specify the scope referred to? Thanks, Ludovic. _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user