* gh_new_procedure with c++
@ 2008-06-22 22:13 gianluca giorgolo
2008-06-23 9:59 ` Ludovic Courtès
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: gianluca giorgolo @ 2008-06-22 22:13 UTC (permalink / raw
To: guile-user
Hi,
I'm sorry if the question has already been answered on the list but I couldn't find any reference to the topic in the archive (nor in guile user manual).
I'm trying to use 'gh_new_procedure' to define a new procedure for Scheme that refers to a c++ function. This function takes more than 0 arguments. But given that the gh_new_procedure is defined as taking a function with no argument, g++ complains about the invalid conversion:
main.cpp:131: error: invalid conversion from ‘scm_unused_struct* (*)(scm_unused_struct*, scm_unused_struct*, scm_unused_struct*, scm_unused_struct*, scm_unused_struct*)’ to ‘scm_unused_struct* (*)()’
main.cpp:131: error: initializing argument 2 of ‘scm_unused_struct* gh_new_procedure(const char*, scm_unused_struct* (*)(), int, int, int)’
(I'm using guile 1.8.1 and gcc 4.1.3)
Is there any way to avoid the type conversion that apparently g++ doesn't like?
Thanks a lot in advance for any reply!
Gianluca
___________________________________
Scopri il Blog di Yahoo! Mail: trucchi, novità, consigli... e la tua opinione!
http://www.ymailblogit.com/blog/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: gh_new_procedure with c++
2008-06-22 22:13 gh_new_procedure with c++ gianluca giorgolo
@ 2008-06-23 9:59 ` Ludovic Courtès
2008-06-23 11:47 ` Ludovic Courtès
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2008-06-23 9:59 UTC (permalink / raw
To: guile-user
Hello,
gianluca giorgolo <giorghy@yahoo.it> writes:
> I'm trying to use 'gh_new_procedure' to define a new procedure for Scheme that refers to a c++ function. This function takes more than 0 arguments. But given that the gh_new_procedure is defined as taking a function with no argument, g++ complains about the invalid conversion:
>
> main.cpp:131: error: invalid conversion from ‘scm_unused_struct* (*)(scm_unused_struct*, scm_unused_struct*, scm_unused_struct*, scm_unused_struct*, scm_unused_struct*)’ to ‘scm_unused_struct* (*)()’
> main.cpp:131: error: initializing argument 2 of ‘scm_unused_struct* gh_new_procedure(const char*, scm_unused_struct* (*)(), int, int, int)’
I think it has to be a C function, not a C++ function, i.e., your
function declaration and definition has to be surrounded by `extern "C"
{ ... }'.
This is because the argument to `gh_new_procedure ()' is *not* a
zero-argument function, but a function with *any* number of arguments.
Until the C99 standard (included), "void (* foo) ()" means "pointer to a
function taking any number of arguments"; in C++, it means "pointer to a
function with no arguments". Future C standards will probably follow
C++ on that, as noted in the "Future Language Directions" of C99
(Section 6.11.6):
The use of function declarators with empty parentheses (not
prototype-format parameter type declarators) is an obsolescent
feature.
This means Guile will eventually have to find another solution.
Besides, `gh_new_procedure ()' is deprecated in 1.8; you should use
`scm_c_define_gsubr ()' instead.
Thanks,
Ludovic.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: gh_new_procedure with c++
2008-06-23 9:59 ` Ludovic Courtès
@ 2008-06-23 11:47 ` Ludovic Courtès
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2008-06-23 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw
To: guile-user
Hi,
ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> This is because the argument to `gh_new_procedure ()' is *not* a
> zero-argument function, but a function with *any* number of arguments.
> Until the C99 standard (included), "void (* foo) ()" means "pointer to a
> function taking any number of arguments"; in C++, it means "pointer to a
> function with no arguments". Future C standards will probably follow
> C++ on that, as noted in the "Future Language Directions" of C99
> (Section 6.11.6):
>
> The use of function declarators with empty parentheses (not
> prototype-format parameter type declarators) is an obsolescent
> feature.
>
> This means Guile will eventually have to find another solution.
I just filed a bug:
https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?23681
Thanks,
Ludovic.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-06-23 11:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-06-22 22:13 gh_new_procedure with c++ gianluca giorgolo
2008-06-23 9:59 ` Ludovic Courtès
2008-06-23 11:47 ` Ludovic Courtès
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).