From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Neil Jerram Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Guile-PG 0.38 available Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:30:31 +0100 Message-ID: <87zlbuk7ig.fsf@arudy.ossau.uklinux.net> References: <874ou8brx8.fsf@ambire.localdomain> <1246021034.9470.33.camel@localhost> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1246051865 11059 80.91.229.12 (26 Jun 2009 21:31:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 21:31:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org To: J Roberto B A Monteiro Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 26 23:30:58 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MKJ0b-0008Mm-5q for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 23:30:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48896 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MKJ0a-00016a-Ie for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 17:30:56 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MKJ0J-00015i-Nn for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 17:30:39 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MKJ0F-00013z-7c for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 17:30:39 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40700 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MKJ0F-00013p-45 for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 17:30:35 -0400 Original-Received: from mail3.uklinux.net ([80.84.72.33]:42841) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MKJ0E-00049G-6c for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 17:30:35 -0400 Original-Received: from arudy (host86-152-99-133.range86-152.btcentralplus.com [86.152.99.133]) by mail3.uklinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 436271F99ED; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:30:33 +0100 (BST) Original-Received: from arudy.ossau.uklinux.net (arudy [127.0.0.1]) by arudy (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4E923801F; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:30:31 +0100 (BST) In-Reply-To: <1246021034.9470.33.camel@localhost> (J. Roberto B. A. Monteiro's message of "Fri\, 26 Jun 2009 09\:57\:14 -0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:7347 Archived-At: J Roberto B A Monteiro writes: > On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 10:20 +0200, Thien-Thi Nguyen wrote: > > This is alpha code (pre 1.0 release), tested with Guile 1.4.x and > PostgreSQL 7.4, 8.0, 8.1, 8.2, 8.3. It may have bugs, and the > interfaces may change from version to version. > > > Does it run with Guile-1.8 or newer? Unless the codebase has changed a lot recently, no, it doesn't. The problem is that some of the supporting tools in ttn's Guile 1.4.x are significantly different from those in 1.8/1.9, and that makes it difficult to build the Guile-PG code with 1.8/1.9. I spent some time recently on this, but didn't get very far before concluding that it would be a better use of time to look generally at the tool divergences, and to try to reconcile those. Regards, Neil