From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Guile base64 Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2010 23:58:16 +0200 Message-ID: <87zkvvsvif.fsf@ambire.localdomain> References: <1283364621.2401.8.camel@romel-compaq> <87fwxsftsu.fsf@gnu.org> <871v9blnyr.fsf@delenn.lan> <1283544958.4017.4.camel@romel-compaq> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1283724117 2030 80.91.229.12 (5 Sep 2010 22:01:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2010 22:01:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org To: Romel Sandoval Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 06 00:01:56 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OsNHd-0006Vz-U9 for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Sep 2010 00:01:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35457 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OsNHd-0004BN-2h for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Sun, 05 Sep 2010 18:01:53 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=57498 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OsNHY-00048v-Lb for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Sep 2010 18:01:49 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OsNHX-0006s5-El for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Sep 2010 18:01:48 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp207.alice.it ([82.57.200.103]:35927) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OsNHX-0006rt-8q for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Sep 2010 18:01:47 -0400 Original-Received: from ambire.localdomain (95.244.66.162) by smtp207.alice.it (8.5.124.08) id 4C1A26CF049E0C07; Mon, 6 Sep 2010 00:01:43 +0200 Original-Received: from ttn by ambire.localdomain with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OsNE8-0002Kk-Mn; Sun, 05 Sep 2010 23:58:16 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1283544958.4017.4.camel@romel-compaq> (Romel Sandoval's message of "Fri, 03 Sep 2010 15:15:58 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Windows 98 (1) X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:8156 Archived-At: () Romel Sandoval () Fri, 03 Sep 2010 15:15:58 -0500 Do you think any of mentioned implementations should be included with Guile 2.0 or it's better to keep it apart? Probably next week (2010-09-13 onward) i can find some time to add (ice-9 base64) from Guile 1.4.x. However, that implementation uses =E2=80=98(srfi srfi-56) read-byte=E2=80=99, which is not available in Guile= 2. Could someone suggest a replacement?