* Guildhall users: please update your GUILE_LOAD_PATH or %load-path
@ 2013-01-31 0:47 Mark H Weaver
2013-02-02 8:34 ` Ian Price
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Mark H Weaver @ 2013-01-31 0:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: guile-user; +Cc: Ian Price
Hello all,
In the future it will be important for Guildhall modules to have a lower
priority than in the search path than Guile's core modules. The reason
is that Guildhall has several portable SRFIs, some of which will be
superceded by efficient native implementations in core Guile. One such
example is SRFI-41, which will soon be replaced by a superior version in
Guile core.
There are two ways to arrange for Guildhall's directory to have a lower
priority than Guile's core modules:
* If you added Guildhall's directory to the GUILE_LOAD_PATH environment
variable, then make sure "/home/USERNAME/.local/share/guile/site/2.0"
comes last, and add a special dummy path component composed of three
dots (...) immediately before it. For example:
GUILE_LOAD_PATH=...:/home/<USER>/.local/share/guile/site/2.0
or:
GUILE_LOAD_PATH=/foo:...:/home/<USER>/.local/share/guile/site/2.0
In Guile 2.0.7 and later versions, all path components after the "..."
will be added after the default Guile search path. In earlier
versions, the "..." will do nothing but harmlessly await your future
upgrade to 2.0.7+ :)
* If you added Guildhall's directory to the %load-path variable from
within Guile itself (perhaps in .guile) then append it to the *end* of
the load path as follows:
(set! %load-path
(append %load-path
(list "/home/<USER>/.local/share/guile/site/2.0")))
Ian, can you please update your Guildhall "Getting-Started" document
appropriately? <https://github.com/ijp/guildhall/wiki/Getting-Started>
Thanks!
Mark
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Guildhall users: please update your GUILE_LOAD_PATH or %load-path
2013-01-31 0:47 Guildhall users: please update your GUILE_LOAD_PATH or %load-path Mark H Weaver
@ 2013-02-02 8:34 ` Ian Price
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ian Price @ 2013-02-02 8:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark H Weaver; +Cc: guile-user
Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org> writes:
> In the future it will be important for Guildhall modules to have a lower
> priority than in the search path than Guile's core modules. The reason
> is that Guildhall has several portable SRFIs, some of which will be
> superceded by efficient native implementations in core Guile. One such
> example is SRFI-41, which will soon be replaced by a superior version in
> Guile core.
Not just SRFIs, who knows what other packages will end up bundled with
Guile in the future. However, I do ideally want to see modules in the
Guildhall first, and this change allows this.
> Ian, can you please update your Guildhall "Getting-Started" document
> appropriately? <https://github.com/ijp/guildhall/wiki/Getting-Started>
I have updated the page accordingly.
--
Ian Price -- shift-reset.com
"Programming is like pinball. The reward for doing it well is
the opportunity to do it again" - from "The Wizardy Compiled"
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-02-02 8:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-01-31 0:47 Guildhall users: please update your GUILE_LOAD_PATH or %load-path Mark H Weaver
2013-02-02 8:34 ` Ian Price
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).