From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: guile can't find a chinese named file Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 22:23:05 +0100 Message-ID: <87y3wssl3a.fsf@pobox.com> References: <874m0gd3z4.fsf@gnu.org> <87wpdc8rx7.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <87poj4r04c.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87k29c8q3b.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <87h94gqz34.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87fuk0ctve.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <878tpsqtzl.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87zii8bcdw.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <87y3xspcux.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <8737fgtnn7.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1488144221 13227 195.159.176.226 (26 Feb 2017 21:23:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 21:23:41 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 26 22:23:37 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ci6I3-0002kZ-Ia for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Sun, 26 Feb 2017 22:23:35 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48372 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ci6I9-0006Z1-Gs for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Sun, 26 Feb 2017 16:23:41 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33375) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ci6Ho-0006Yi-6Z for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Feb 2017 16:23:21 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ci6Hk-00073E-7j for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Feb 2017 16:23:20 -0500 Original-Received: from pb-sasl2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.67]:54627 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ci6Hk-000738-1f; Sun, 26 Feb 2017 16:23:16 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77BB962180; Sun, 26 Feb 2017 16:23:15 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=JafBsAyejLEA x1bMK14KEFpp+NY=; b=sjUmv4sob5N6wzepnuc90XffMyC+P68ZcPgMKLM9d9d2 /c7S6W3MeMkKFyFEqiGae1SOyMWkTyz/NmO/hcCqQSM51MuRYSyXpf0hqlTfrhdA M0m57x5zz2hx+5dSstYiejxSf9+dQXRtqe8kOoQgXxzUvDlxfpeWg+RQrx3H4gA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=u6duHy e+sn6LqsX9olQaIAVU9jhOIoKNF7bJspr97K5K53nbxQ1iagJjDc2HVt2FJBgByh YeUdw+zj1+ACgGE/Y3K4WP55M1MzHALkKzJq81seD0xMYACUcgbITInGbUqW5TQ2 q2E56DWPiVC90d9a9EN2prTrh5Y1DRefA0F8A= Original-Received: from pb-sasl2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69C776217F; Sun, 26 Feb 2017 16:23:15 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from clucks (unknown [88.160.190.192]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-sasl2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2871A6217E; Sun, 26 Feb 2017 16:23:13 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <8737fgtnn7.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Tue, 14 Feb 2017 23:26:20 +0100") X-Pobox-Relay-ID: C87096A0-FC69-11E6-8CC6-6141F2301B6D-02397024!pb-sasl2.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 64.147.108.67 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "guile-user" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:13327 Archived-At: On Tue 14 Feb 2017 23:26, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > There were discussions to move to UTF-8 internally in 2.2. As Mike > explained, that was not really an option in 2.0 mostly due to the > requirement to support O(1) random access. AFAIU this requirement was relaxed in R7RS. I think we could revisit it; there are tradeoffs but the trade winds could blow due UTF-8-wards in the end. My memory of the state of things was that Mark was going to have a look at it but he is affected by a global shortage of round tuits :) Andy