unofficial mirror of guile-user@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thien-Thi Nguyen <ttn@gnuvola.org>
To: rixed@happyleptic.org
Cc: guile-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Best way to call a user defined hook (written in guile) from C when the hook need plenty parameters
Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2010 11:57:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wrtantcw.fsf@ambire.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100705085635.GB9492@apc> (rixed@happyleptic.org's message of "Mon, 5 Jul 2010 10:56:36 +0200")

() rixed@happyleptic.org
() Mon, 5 Jul 2010 10:56:36 +0200

   Can anyone suggest a better way to do this ?

For "a set of named values", you can use an association list.

If the paren verbosity is off-putting, a common way is to take/show
plists externally (minimal (one) set of parens).  So, user sees:

  (k1 v1 k2 v2 ...)

which is not so threatening, but you manipulate internally:
 
  ((k1 . v1)
   (k2 . v2)
   ...)

This requires a transform, but you do that anyway
(as part of validating the user input), right?

All this presumes that there is no need to specify all keys all the time.
(Re-reading your post, perhaps i am misunderstanding the problem question.)

If the problem really is: how to avoid unwieldy argument lists, the answer
is still "use an association list", but pass to the user a procedure that
encapsulates it.  For example:

(define (query-proc alist)
  "Encapsulate ALIST; return a procedure to query it."
  (lambda (key)
    (assoc-ref alist key)))

(define ALIST '((k1 . v1) (k2 . v2)))
(define QUERY (query-proc ALIST))

;; On the user side:

(define (monitor query)
  (for-each (lambda (key)
              (simple-format #t "k: ~S~%v: ~S~%" key (query key)))
            '(k1 k2)))

This example is read-only; if you want ‘monitor’ to be able to munge
you can change ‘query-proc’ to perhaps ‘query/munge-proc’:

(define (query/munge-proc alist)
  "Encapsulate ALIST; return a procedure query/munge it."
  (lambda (key . newval)
    (if (null? newval)
        (assoc-ref alist key)
        (set! alist (assoc-set! alist key (car newval))))))
        
(It all depends on how much you trust the users.  ;-)

thi



  reply	other threads:[~2010-07-05  9:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-05  8:56 Best way to call a user defined hook (written in guile) from C when the hook need plenty parameters rixed
2010-07-05  9:57 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen [this message]
2010-07-07 14:33   ` Cedric Cellier
2010-07-05 20:18 ` Neil Jerram
2010-07-06 11:22   ` Cedric Cellier
2010-07-08 19:51   ` Andy Wingo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87wrtantcw.fsf@ambire.localdomain \
    --to=ttn@gnuvola.org \
    --cc=guile-user@gnu.org \
    --cc=rixed@happyleptic.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).