From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: stupid mail about letrec Date: 25 Mar 2002 08:02:15 -0800 Sender: guile-user-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <87vgbk1vqw.fsf@becket.becket.net> References: <20020325.140227.71101513.Sven.Hartrumpf@FernUni-Hagen.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1017076960 31142 127.0.0.1 (25 Mar 2002 17:22:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 17:22:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16pYB5-00086B-00 for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 18:22:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16pY9r-0003W2-00; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 12:21:23 -0500 Original-Received: from vp190174.reshsg.uci.edu ([128.195.190.174] helo=becket.becket.net) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16pWtS-0006Em-00 for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 11:00:22 -0500 Original-Received: from tb by becket.becket.net with local (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16pWvH-0007Kj-00; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 08:02:15 -0800 Original-To: Sven Hartrumpf X-Reply-Permission: Posted or emailed replies to this message constitute permission for an emailed response. X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1F0A1E51 63 28 EB DA E6 44 E5 5E EC F3 04 26 4E BF 1A 92 X-Windows: You'll envy the dead. In-Reply-To: <20020325.140227.71101513.Sven.Hartrumpf@FernUni-Hagen.de> Original-Lines: 12 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 Errors-To: guile-user-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:55 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user:55 Sven Hartrumpf writes: > >So chicken and MIT-scheme don't give you an error for the letrec > >expression that you quoted before? > > No, all return 8 for (letrec ((a 2) (b (* a 4))) b). > Also mzscheme, bigloo, chez, sisc, scsh, gauche, gambit. > Only SCM behaves like guile. > This might make an interesting posting in comp.lang.scheme :-) Yes, but it is an error nontheless. _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user