From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Vollmer Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: case syntax and symbols Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 22:23:23 +0300 Message-ID: <87vf4ri91w.fsf@zagadka.de> References: <1111445850.6034.15.camel@vandvndr.physics.uiuc.edu> <87is3k1oxe.fsf@zagadka.de> <423FC796.4010303@ossau.uklinux.net> <874qcv40q4.fsf@zagadka.de> <4292236E.1050000@ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1118088684 8269 80.91.229.2 (6 Jun 2005 20:11:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 20:11:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 06 22:11:15 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DfNu7-0006gz-T5 for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2005 22:09:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DfO0R-0000sR-VO for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2005 16:15:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DfNuF-0006Os-7B for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2005 16:09:07 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DfNuE-0006Ne-GK for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2005 16:09:06 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DfNnh-0003s3-Eu for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2005 16:02:21 -0400 Original-Received: from [213.243.153.36] (helo=smtp3.pp.htv.fi) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DfNFA-00030l-Co for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2005 15:26:40 -0400 Original-Received: from zagadka.ping.de (cs181072157.pp.htv.fi [82.181.72.157]) by smtp3.pp.htv.fi (Postfix) with SMTP id 987D327AC8B for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 22:23:22 +0300 (EEST) Original-Received: (qmail 11140 invoked by uid 1000); 6 Jun 2005 19:23:23 -0000 Original-To: Neil Jerram In-Reply-To: <4292236E.1050000@ossau.uklinux.net> (Neil Jerram's message of "Mon, 23 May 2005 19:39:42 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:4615 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user:4615 Neil Jerram writes: > Marius Vollmer wrote: >> Hmm. There are two things here that might want a warning: >> redefining >> something that was a macro as a variable; > > Sounds good; and vice versa? Yes, and vice versa. > By the way, has your idea about having "identifier -> macro" instead > of "identifier -> variable -> macro" been implemented yet? No, and I have no plans to do it before 1.8. > Isn't the rule we want "whenever a new definition shadows an existing > definition in a module, and the existing definition did not originate > in the current module"? This rule would also avoid giving unwanted > warnings when an edited module is reloaded. Yes, that sounds like a better rule to me. -- GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3 331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405 _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user