From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: set-current-module in .guile ? Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2008 09:16:13 +0200 Message-ID: <87ve2unnia.fsf@gnu.org> References: <18423.46537.161648.253613@entangle.lvc.edu> <47F7E878.20609@wilsonjc.us> <87iqyvrpwj.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1207552823 900 80.91.229.12 (7 Apr 2008 07:20:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 07:20:23 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-user@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 07 09:20:56 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Jilew-0004tc-Dp for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 09:20:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JileI-00029Y-Vy for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 03:20:14 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JileE-00029J-DN for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 03:20:10 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JileB-000297-RO for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 03:20:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JileB-000294-Kg for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 03:20:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JileB-0008JY-1b for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 03:20:07 -0400 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JileA-0001at-D6 for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 03:20:06 -0400 Original-Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Jile6-0005cl-Fp for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 07:20:03 +0000 Original-Received: from 193.50.110.109 ([193.50.110.109]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 07:20:02 +0000 Original-Received: from ludo by 193.50.110.109 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 07:20:02 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 23 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 193.50.110.109 X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 19 Germinal an 216 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEB1F5364 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 821D 815D 902A 7EAB 5CEE D120 7FBA 3D4F EB1F 5364 X-OS: i686-pc-linux-gnu User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Y1DzBfKt3zv67Lti4+SKHfMfQNw= X-detected-kernel: by mx20.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:6522 Archived-At: Hi, "Walck, Scott" writes: > guile> (+ (vector 5 6) (vector 7 8)) > Segmentation fault (core dumped) It's possible that it's a bug in your implementation of `+', i.e., in `guile-scmutils'. Can you run gdb on the core (using "gdb `which guile` core") and show us the backtrace (using "bt" within gdb)? > guile> (set-current-module generic-environment) > # > guile> + > # > guile> (+ (vector 2 3) (vector 5 6)) > #(7 9) Strange that it works here. So the above segfault may not be due to `guile-scmutils'... Thanks, Ludovic.