From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Why 3 different evaluators? Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 23:16:01 +0100 Message-ID: <87vcok4j4u.fsf@pobox.com> References: <20111116050005.GA19554@happyleptic.org> <8739domn0s.fsf@pobox.com> <20111116101708.GA18426@ccellier.rd.securactive.lan> <87d3crlx7p.fsf@pobox.com> <1321472632.6080.YahooMailNeo@web37902.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20111117052919.GA1487@happyleptic.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1326147382 24508 80.91.229.12 (9 Jan 2012 22:16:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 22:16:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "guile-user@gnu.org" To: rixed@happyleptic.org Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 09 23:16:18 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RkNVm-0007vx-26 for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 23:16:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48469 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RkNVl-0001Nd-Hc for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 17:16:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:42983) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RkNVh-0001NY-Gh for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 17:16:10 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RkNVg-0008HP-E8 for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 17:16:09 -0500 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([74.115.168.62]:39559 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RkNVg-0008HL-80 for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 17:16:08 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14EBF810C; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 17:16:08 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=JefXFA0jgTompjCaKpeD+209Pmc=; b=dKWfL4 i8I89Oal4aBOxbDzSUiIkQFEh6okVO/ZXIAl3wnkl+oZANrSOB6ystydnxVIQvdp kWhUTQw5mrTEO2crhrCGzcTJ2pJaDTzQZg4+iTaS+RedQI0B2M5929+c7QONY23W miX4bJoqo3XRi3SbRijIbgPaPRJQZb06p/Ejk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=It1DgdkgTTjJYTBFY3YgbYydGoIglpde XTL5FKlhMfR2nTWc+UMqZnLklEflanMHHFZQW26qcjMWmjRpu/A/awZRjiWaKE4R Ihe5w4NyChyAEDNx9a1chuK5zzBo/eZi8NbeVBXRUZ2Je991lPcveDPGs7ml6Hy7 rHkX7oZ0ZMY= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2F38810B; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 17:16:07 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from badger (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4D066810A; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 17:16:06 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20111117052919.GA1487@happyleptic.org> (rixed@happyleptic.org's message of "Thu, 17 Nov 2011 06:29:21 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 867D5C36-3B0F-11E1-91EF-65B1DE995924-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 74.115.168.62 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:9116 Archived-At: On Thu 17 Nov 2011 06:29, rixed@happyleptic.org writes: > -[ Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:43:52AM -0800, Mike Gran ]---- >> I believe that you can still run the whole test suite on the C evaluator >> by erasing all the .go files from the modules lib, setting auto compile off, >> then running the check-guile script. > > I though it would run the evaluator written in scheme in that case. The Scheme evaluator only runs if ice-9/eval.go is present and up to date. Otherwise the fallback C evaluator is used. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/